Chas Campbell free power motor

[utilitarian]

Secondary axis? I don't see secondary axis in the machine here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2326.0.html. How does your concept explain why that machine is working if there is no secondary axis?

Omnibus, if you think that machine is real, you are a world class sucker.  Though I have to say, if you fell for the "expensife" spinny screw drum, I suppose you will believe anything.

Aha, so now it's not the secondary axis but that the machine isn't real. Make up your mind first before playing the role of a "skeptic".

I think it was P-Motion who brought up the secondary axis.  I think the device is completely bogus.  It is advertised just like every other bogus OU claim out there.

[Omnibus]

Secondary axis? I don't see secondary axis in the machine here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2326.0.html. How does your concept explain why that machine is working if there is no secondary axis?

Omnibus, if you think that machine is real, you are a world class sucker.  Though I have to say, if you fell for the "expensife" spinny screw drum, I suppose you will believe anything.

Aha, so now it's not the secondary axis but that the machine isn't real. Make up your mind first before playing the role of a "skeptic".

I think it was P-Motion who brought up the secondary axis.  I think the device is completely bogus.  It is advertised just like every other bogus OU claim out there.

OK, so now let's wait for P-Motion to lay out the equations which prove his secondary axis point. As for the device being bogus, on what grounds are you pronouncing it as such?

[mapsrg]

not available...........This site must be about verification.IF not it is rumour

[utilitarian]

OK, so now let's wait for P-Motion to lay out the equations which prove his secondary axis point. As for the device being bogus, on what grounds are you pronouncing it as such?

I have no grounds but the tested principles of physics.

Mr. Omnibus, I respect your intensity, but in your quest for the holy grail of free energy, somewhere along the way you have lost the sense of who should bear the burden of proof in situations like these.  Posting a video is not nearly enough evidence, not by a very long shot.  Power sources are easy to hide in videos.  Posting a video does not reverse the burden of proof onto the skeptics.  Far from it, a video is merely the first tiny step to getting the word out.  Then, the device must be replicated and verified by reputable people or organizations.

So, we are still in the position where we started with regard to the device you just cited, as well as expenzife and even Finsrud for that matter.  We have virtually nothing.  A video is not quite nothing, but it is almost nothing, considering the number of practical jokes on Youtube.  The burden is still on the purported inventors to get their inventions verified.  Until then, this kind of stuff really isn't worth lifting an eyebrow at. 

Back to original topic, the things that the people on this forum have done to replicate the screw drum thingy is more than enough to discredit the whole thing.  These good folks have gone above and beyond what is expected from someone's practical joke, so let's put the screw drum to rest, shall we?

[Pirate88179]

@ Ultilitarian:

I agree 100%, for whatever that is worth.

Bill