Chas Campbell free power motor

[sm0ky2]

@ Gravitar

Your design for the multiple-wheel device, concerning the ratios of the wheels::

the ratio of the wheels are not going to spin at the same rate at any ratio. the problem here is that for them to gear off each other either from the inside diameter or the outside diameter, the same degree of each wheel must pass each other at the same rate.  if they are not the same size this causes a problem with surface distances, thus the spin rate will always be different.

[Humbugger]

Hi Mark,

You would be more then welcome to attend, we are getting help by others who have watt hour meters for the board. So no need ATM to come and see what can be done any ways, these are trade professional Watt hour meters and can tell you every thing you need to know.

So far AS IS all signs have pointed to it being a mechanical flywheel storage system,  However we are going to do some pulse tests based on Lawrence's advice and others.

Even after every one closes the book on his set up we are still going to do ALT extraction stuff and pulsed duty cycle tests. So at least the board has an R and D tool to play with. If more then interesting results are observed you are more then welcome upon approval from Chas to come in and check for magic hamsters or poor measuring technique.

Have a safe trip mate.

@Mark 

Nice invitation huh?  You're welcome to come; no need to come we don't need you; you can't come until after we get Charles' approval; you can come some other time after we demonstrate remarkable findings...have a nice trip (i.e. we won't be seeing you any time soon).  I think maybe he remembers that you once said Humbugger had some valid suggestions.     

Maybe you or someone could ask Ashtweth what kind of wattmeters they are for us.  Trade professional is not a brand or model I'm familiar with.  It would be good for the members here to have some specifics on the manufacturer and model number to investigate the specs.

Anyway, Mark, you get an A+ in my book FWIW for trying to help and for trying to be there as a credible witness for the NEC, an outfit that has earned respect for doing some real science and for staying out of the "claim first, pass the hat, get the donations and test later" crowd. 

Don't feel bad, I wasn't invited either.


Humbugger

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Guys Chas's page and all related pages based on our findings SO FAR has been updated.
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/ChasCampbell.htm

Panacea has since investigated and found that Chas's current designs are still at a research and development stage and not able to produce free power until further testing and improvements are done.Panacea does find that Chas's ideas have potential and are worthy of grant support

We will continue to add the Video production after this weekend. Also Lawrence, your info related to the Chas system has been added to his page and yours please check R and D principles.
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/WangShumHo.htm

This should also silence the old fart above me.

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

>Again, I have heard/seen of nothing documented here that works.  If there is something that does, please post a link for me as I missed it.  Also, all that I HAVE built has not worked (I promise, I am not running my house here for free, if I was I would probably not be reading here).

FE reported to me as working- which you must build yourself to test to confirm

One engineers report- David Kou ( RV neon)

Two engineers Lawton and Ravi i know reported-
Working Water fuel cell.

Your RV can also improve the efficiency.

regards
ashtweth

[Humbugger]

Guys Chas's page and all related pages based on our findings SO FAR has been updated.
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/ChasCampbell.htm

We will continue to add the Video production after this weekend. Also Lawrence, your info related to the Chas system has been added to his page and yours please check R and D principles.
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/WangShumHo.htm

This should also silence the old fart above me.

Your ideas of what will "silence" me are very strange.  The way to keep me from commenting is to stop being such a little tyrant and slow down with the exaggerated, misleading and untrue statements you are becoming famous for. 

Personally, [and only because you publicly speculated about what my reaction would be do I offer my opinion here] I found your newly-edited BOCAF pages to be poorly written, rambling, babbling and full of grammatical, factual and spelling errors as well as exaggerations, all quite as usual.  Not to mention a lack of technical substance.

It is nice to see that you finally pulled some of the premature claims of free energy produced by Charles' machine.  On the Wang entries, I think you'd better check with Lawrence again for accuracy.  I believe there are serious discrepancies between what your page states and what Lawrence states regarding Lawrence and Wang's present business/promotional relationship.

It's also interesting to me that you miss no opportunity to hurl vulgar names and insults in my direction.  Nice to know I'm in your thoughts.  Good luck on your visit with Charles and drive safely. 

Humbugger