The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[Pegasus]

Anyone here has noticed this?:
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/emery.htm

Its the perpetual motion holder of Ed Leedskalin.The device shows to work and has been replicated by other people,and it shows the same effects of the coil of the brazilian friend:something is circulating in it,tested by instrumentation.The unique difference here is that the charge in the coils is not regenerating,and the magnetic field is close-looped.Personally I will start to build this adding the secondary coils and the rigth connections like the ones of Barnbrade and see what is going on adding a kick with a magnet.....

Regards,
Pegasus

[Doug56]

@All

I don't know if the page bellow already posted in this forum, but a guy tried make a Daniel McFarland Cook patent replica, but its don't work:

Here: http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoil.htm

And here: http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookUpDate.htm

And pictures here: http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoilPics.htm

More pictures:http://my.voyager.net/~jrrandall/CookCoilPics2.htm

Please, note that the author did not use aluminum (alufoil) layers between the coils. It seems that Brnbrade was the only one whose device worked.

Regards

Doug

[bob.rennips]

@Builders

Did you guys see my post (Page 27 - Reply 268) with photo showing the terminal names so we can talk the same language. Did any of you try the small test? There is definitely something here and will require further testing.

Your coil 1 needs rotating 180 degrees and the connections remade accordingly.

[starcruiser]

[hartiberlin]

Hi ALL,

I've carefully read the Farland text and despite some of the text and diagram being missing I am sure of the following as per the Farland arrangement:

1. There is only one metal bar.
2. The coils are placed on this one metal bar.
3. The sense of the turnings on the coil and therefore the placement of N-S is crucial. This point is stressed in the patent.

The first image shows the arrangement as per the Farland TEXT.

The second image shows that to get from the Farland arrangment with one iron bar to the brnbrade arrangement with two iron bars, you need to rotate the coil set B 180 degress, which obviously changes the N-S position - so be doubly sure your coils don't need rotating 180 degrees and reconnected accordingly.

This arrangement makes sense on a number of levels as the magnetic field now becomes additive and the currents all flow in one direciton creating a magnetic field and a current that flows round in a circle. Note at the same time the capacitative elements surmised as the missing text and diagram by Brnbrade still apply.

Hope this helps - I'll be trying this out at the weekend.

Cheers Bob.

Hi Bob,
many thanks for the indeepth reading and seeing these results, that Cook
only used ONE iron rod.

This way, it really makes more sense and is also much more logical.
Maybe Brnbrade had the coupling via his magnets at the left side ?

Hi Brnbrade,
can you please document your device some more ?
Also can you rebuild 2 more devices and see, if they will
also work ?
Many thanks.