US #4,936,96 Stan Meyers Patent Expired and FREE to ALL

[saintsnick]

In June of 2007, the fundamental "Methods" patent of Stanley Meyer (US #4,936,961)  expires, finally placing this technology into the public domain in the United States.

BUILD IT. SELL IT.

Not sure if this includes the other patent utilizing Laser energy to FURTHER increase yield.

Replications starting to pop up around the globe !

http://www.h2earth.org/main.htm

Remember:

As LITTLE current flow as possible according to Meyer... less current = less power input

NO ELECTROLYTES, to CUT current and Cut corosion too, distilled water BEST

NO Magical Frequency

-All about water acting as dielectric, PREVENTING current flow.
-High Voltage circuit step charges water cell as giant capacitor
-Voltage SPIKES step voltage upward in water cell.
-Catastrophic VOLTAGE Breakdown of water, NO CURRENT
-HV Chokes further STOP Current
-HV Diode causes unidirectional pulses upon water, alowing charge build up
-Circuit as whole electrically TUNED to resonate: Water Capacitance, HV Choke   
    Inductance, Transformer Inductance. DO THE CALCULATIONS, TUNE YOUR CIRCUIT
-Simple HV Circuits work BETTER than fancy ones... JUST TUNE THE HV SIDE of ckt
-555 / FET / Transformer ckts HAVE worked
-Feedback PLL ckt NOT necessary... only helps maintain stable output

ANY BETTER IDEAS POSTED AFTER THIS is  DISINFORMATION
ANY NEGATIVE REPLIES TO THIS is  DISINFORMATION

READ THE PATENT
Be the NEXT recreation !

[lincolninked]

Disinformation, in all caps.  That is what we need.  More disinformation!

How do we know a clever man like Meyers did not protect his real invention by posting a bogus patent to throw the sent off of what he really did, which is simpler and easier to build/replicate?  Or even worse, maybe he had a rather large air pump under the table to milk investors?

I am a simple man, and in my simple mind you do not turn on the lights in the room by unscrewing the bulbs.

You also do not turn up the hydrogen production by switching off/on/off/on the current.  The off cycles do not produce anything except lost time and wasted production.

If the off cycles produce, that sounds to me like a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

I am new to this board and one person here already thinks I am out to get him (lol) so I do not wish to step on toes, however (big however) if the notion of more from less is possible, I want that dream as much as the next guy. 

This is reality:  I feel Meyer was milking investors or playing a trick and we are still seeing the wake of that rather large ship passing by in our calm waters.

[hkyle]

The on/off on/off in the meyers cell is the step charging efect that increase the voltage in the cap.

First adds 130v then off, add another 130v then off, add another 130v then off, until you surpass the dialectric constant of water.....

I guess I'm dreaming cause I hit 150% faraday current efficient in my old cell. Thats 50% more than the books say.

You are right with one thing....that meyer posted alot of bull in his patents to protect the real thing...that's why it is so hard to replicate. It's all there just toss out the bull and fill in the blanks...

think about it....and read some more. We shall all get there some day.

Disinformation, in all caps.  That is what we need.  More disinformation!

How do we know a clever man like Meyers did not protect his real invention by posting a bogus patent to throw the sent off of what he really did, which is simpler and easier to build/replicate?  Or even worse, maybe he had a rather large air pump under the table to milk investors?

I am a simple man, and in my simple mind you do not turn on the lights in the room by unscrewing the bulbs.

You also do not turn up the hydrogen production by switching off/on/off/on the current.  The off cycles do not produce anything except lost time and wasted production.

If the off cycles produce, that sounds to me like a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

I am new to this board and one person here already thinks I am out to get him (lol) so I do not wish to step on toes, however (big however) if the notion of more from less is possible, I want that dream as much as the next guy. 

This is reality:  I feel Meyer was milking investors or playing a trick and we are still seeing the wake of that rather large ship passing by in our calm waters.

[saintsnick]

Ya' just couldn't help yourself.  Someone HAD to reply. And you got it wrong still or you fussed it all up on purpose.

Go away Lincoln Log. And take your blinking winkie with you.

Don't try to save this guy hkyle, he's not here to be convinced.

The patent works. The technology is simple. It is EXACTLY as described in the patent.

High voltage DC spikes with NO current flow.

Just for your negative DISINFORMATION comment Lincoln boy, I rebel against YOU and your POSSE.....

Now I share further ......

Here is Meyer himself explaining the Simple of Simple...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqRMKrSAAuY

Could he spell it out ANY simpler?

He CLEARLY explains the Atomic / Chemical Physics theory of operation.

the needed circuit is obvious after this. 

[karl]

People of this earth,
do you know that water is paramagnetic and transforms magnetic energy (if there is a pure magnetic energy) to an opposed field like pyrolytic graphite?
In an high B gradient it repulses itself from a magnet.
at lower fieldstrength (E dominant if E pure exists) the macroscopic attractioneffect appears, on the nanoscopic scale there are no surfacetensions and surfaceeffects which result out of the number of loads.
Karl