The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Well Gaby,

Jokes aside,

I was serious, for once, in this thread. I have been working for a while on this, ever since Gustav Pese and I discussed the subject some 2 or 3 months ago. I put the finishing touches on my essay and put it up on the forum under

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4172.0/topicseen.html

Maybe it will be of help

Hans von Lieven

Dear Hans,

The Lee-Tseung patent states that one can Lead Out energy via vibration in electron motion field (magnetic).  The pulse force in this case comes from the signals in the antenna.

I am sure that the postgraduate students and professors will be happy to add this as an additional topic of research.  Keep such great ideas flowing.  Your writing and graphics are exceptional.  You can definitely help as an advisor.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Lawrence,

We come indeed from two schools of physics. Your school takes a theory and then looks around the universe for examples that appear to fit it in order to justify its existence.

I do not come from this school, nor do I accept any legitimacy for its reasoning.

In my school of physics observation is paramount, acknowledging that a human's capacity for observation is flawed. However, it is all we have to work with.

In contrast to your way of thinking, I observe as well as I can and go to a lot of trouble to establish that my parameters are correct. After having checked against reality that there are no obvious errors, I venture a working hypothesis. Assuming further inquiries are in the affirmative, then, and only then, do I propose a theory.

This is where we differ.

I would love to have a beer with you one of these days, if fortune permits. You appear to be a gentleman of the old school like me, but don't expect me to buy a harebrained theory just because someone is a nice guy.

Incidentally, thanks for the flowers.

Hans von Lieven

[ltseung888]

G'day Lawrence,

We come indeed from two schools of physics. Your school takes a theory and then looks around the universe for examples that appear to fit it in order to justify its existence.

I do not come from this school, nor do I accept any legitimacy for its reasoning.

In my school of physics observation is paramount, acknowledging that a human's capacity for observation is flawed. However, it is all we have to work with.

In contrast to your way of thinking, I observe as well as I can and go to a lot of trouble to establish that my parameters are correct. After having checked against reality that there are no obvious errors, I venture a working hypothesis. Assuming further inquiries are in the affirmative, then, and only then, do I propose a theory.

This is where we differ.

I would love to have a beer with you one of these days, if fortune permits. You appear to be a gentleman of the old school like me, but don't expect me to buy a harebrained theory just because someone is a nice guy.

Incidentally, thanks for the flowers.

Hans von Lieven

Dear Hans,

It is the final result that matters.  You have quoted two cases that I support wholeheartedly.  The latest one on loudspeaker that does not need a battery is simply brilliant.

It is too late for me to re-attend your school (and probably you to attend my school).  However, I do respect that your school can turn out Top Guns.  There is a strong chance that we shall meet in Stockholm within the next few years.  I shall pay for the beer.

[gaby de wilde]

You have quoted two cases that I support wholeheartedly.  The latest one on loudspeaker that does not need a battery is simply brilliant.

Thank you Lawrence for your feedback on my idea.



There are hundreds of different implementations of this invention.  Hans indeed brought up an interesting speaker technology that also uses push/pull interactions, or what I call 3 point interactions and what you call the law of the parallelograms?



2 years ago I supplied you with the theory.

http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor-theory
http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/magnetmotor-it-cant-be

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22magnetmotor%22



Undeniable evidence there is something going on here we can wrench work out of.



I look over some patents, no I didn't read all of them  I'm just one person. I'm sure there is some unrelated stuff mixed in. There is enough interesting stuff here to read forever if you look up the related art.

427868 4770063 4939976 5587894 5861693 6013963 6160336 6191687 3836802 1061206 1119732 1220005 1237862 1303729 1303730 1315862 1316188 1319718 1322622 1349103 1349104 1387736 1395454 1510799 1743978 1745175 1826727 1835721 1859643 1859764 1877140 1900018 1962565 1963213 1974483 001353 000907 017313 032544 0209635 0226401 062785 209637 011925 084904 130227 164824 169497 183387 196741 200216 200925 207203 212257 228154 247459 2009780 2026061 2053881 2088115 2108652 2127165 2157281 2224784 2350248 2351055 2391486 2400869 2413046 2417347 2460707 2482773 2488734 2553875 2560260 2585626 2636340 2813242 2886976 2912244 2939650 2939654 2949550 3018394 3022430 3071705 3095163 3095167 3106058 3120363 3130945 3177654 3182517 3187206 3203644 3227427 3227901 3259784 3261162 3262769 3266233 3267406 3280816 3296491 3312425 3322374 3368141 3368155 3374376 3404854 3428835 3428836 3428927 3433981 3436630 3437885 3440456 3441755 3441761 3441775 3443134 3449098 3464207 3469118 3469130 3482455 3492881 3495791 3504868 3518462 3530617 3535572 3555915 3584515 3609425 3610970 3610971 3626605 3626606 3656013 3662554 3670494 3683707 3717103 3728564 3738334 3748502 3751210 3766094 3770995 3791349 3807244 3809978 3811058 3823570 3836799 3839771 3864326 3879622 3886919 3890161 3890548 3899703 3913004 3947533 3992132 4004210 4006401 4011477 4013906 4014777 4020815 4024421 4025807 4074153 4077001 4082969 4085384 4086893 4093880 4112889 4114161 4121139 4124463 4143639 4151431 4151821 4153653 4163367 4167684 4179633 4181111 4182748 4204485 4205654 4207773 4208592 4213432 4215330 4249096 4249115 4249501 4251992 427868 4289106 4305024 4323046 4325005 4325344 4325795 4326013 4326491 4345569 436405 4372280 4390605 4394230 4424797 4429280 4429288 4432098 4447779 4449509 4452215 4498447 4567407 4765222 4770063 4858582 4877983 4897592 4904926 4939976 4945273 5018180 5074273 5092303 512340 5402021 5436518 5587894 5861693 600457 6013963 6084322 6160336 6191687 6404089 6672539 6777838 6794784 6803696 6844645 6844647 6847186 6867514 6876094 6877318 958829 961914

2430022 2146382 1002097 1186361 1276672 1309450 2013512 202601 2095203 2148512 2164745 2172150 2172240 2191803 2252405 2265149 2284188 2293034 2308210 2313368 2329164 2352209 2357766 2374351 2378772 2416183 2425525 2431081 2434371 2885442 587956 602569 795446

I try to advance the concept in order to explain them in simple words rather then build motors, I keep explaining the same thing until it is simple enough for everyone to know what is going on. I build it into a pendulum, didn't succeed to make the pendulum part amplify the effect but the effect is so clearly there.



http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=524
flux switching pendulum

So now we are here.



http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl?wmf=perpetual-motion.wmv

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=750
View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.

can you see it's all the same stuff?

is my theory or explanation insufficient?

Anything I can improve upon here?

[ltseung888]

Dear Gaby,

I always know that you are a goldmine of ideas and known inventions. 

I modified my signature to reflect the right replies after the moderator deleted some irrelevant posts.  I also put the ?no battery loudspeaker? and the ?water cannon Flying Saucer? links in the posts.

I believe that the ?no battery loudspeaker? is a very good experimental validation of the Lee-Tseung patent that we can Lead Out energy via vibration in electron motion (magnetic) fields.  The pulse is from the signals picked up from the antenna. 

You can see that I am very lazy to do actual experiments.  As you pointed out, many others had done the work.  They just did not explain it according to the Lee-Tseung theory.