Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 46 Guests are viewing this topic.

chrisC

Quote from: utilitarian on March 27, 2008, 12:08:27 AM
Quote from: ltseung888 on March 26, 2008, 09:23:16 PM
Dear Top Gun,

Since I am not a good Internet Physics Teacher, I prefer to take things slowly.  All the slides had been discussed before.  The information is already available.

It is a matter of re-discussing the slides for the benefit of the forum members who still could not understand.

For people like yourself, there is no need for re-discussion.

Please be patient.   GIve a chance for others to catch up.  A few more days or weeks will not hurt.  Think Slides 10-12.

The multiple personality thing is charming up until the point you start arguing with yourself.

That's  another reason why Tseung cannot be taken seriously. No respectable scientist or engineer pretends to be someone else to steer the conversation their way. Very disturbing to say the least!

cheers
chrisC

Cap-Z-ro


Apparently there are many people following this thread...and apparently a great number are not pleased with the use of Asian stereotypes and insults used in reference to Mr. Tseung.

More here...

http://img3.uploadhouse.com/fileuploads/1522/15227327af858c6227203f710f6bf7f15387e3d.jpg

Regards...


chrisC

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on March 27, 2008, 05:31:42 PM

Apparently there are many people following this thread...and apparently a great number are not pleased with the use of Asian stereotypes and insults used in reference to Mr. Tseung.

More here...

http://img3.uploadhouse.com/fileuploads/1522/15227327af858c6227203f710f6bf7f15387e3d.jpg

Regards...



Good one Cap-Z-ro! LOL.

I too am disappointed by the use of the Asian stereotyped in reference of Tseung as I am Asian myself.
That said, Tseung disgraced himself by maintaining with 100% certainty the Lee-Tseung Theory is valid because he said so and the top guns of these commie universities and various other OU 'inventors' apparently 'supported' him.  2000 posts later, he apparently woke up and needed help in verifying his theory!

For someone with the benefits of a higher education and lived in the western hemisphere must have known the scientific world ascertains inventions quite different from the Chairman Mao era!

cheers
chrisC



SeanTheLight

@Tseung - I have had a hard time getting anyone to answer with authority, whether it is correct to measure the distance travelled as a combination of vectors (x and y, out of x/y/z system), or a single curved one. Can you please explain to me (and I believe it will help your case in general) why we should take the bobs traveled distance as a combination of x and y, instead of the curved path we see? Alternately, would it be possible to show the same gain in work done vs energy consumed, calculating a horizontally pulled pendulum along a curved path? If so then the arguments surrounding slide 12 can be approached from both ends, and are no longer in disagreement. If not then I suspect that the explanation of why you use one system of arithmetic over the over will be the deciding argument to convince most people.

I can clearly see that slide 12 is correct, insofar as if you calculate the path travelled as a combination of x and y, the amount of work done seems to be greater than the amount of energy input. Is this the correct way to calculate it though? The distance travelled as calculated by x + y, is greater than the distance the bob actually moves along its curved path. I am enthusiastic to understand, just hesitant to believe in something I don't see for myself

Cap-Z-ro



AHA!!!

Just as I suspected...I thought detected a little more dynamics involved between you and Tseung than met the eye.

Both of you are not who you purport yourselves to be...my sources reveal that you both are in reality top rival sumo wrestlers.

Looks like the jig is up Yokozuna Hakuho...or is it Yokozuna Asashoryu, which ever you are ?

Apparently, Hakuho thwarted his fellow Mongolian Asashoryu, for the sumotori-sized Sakura Cup recently at Blaisdell Arena.

More here...

http://starbulletin.com/2007/06/11/sports/story01.html


I don't know which of you was the winner, but congrats...and many thanks for an entertaining thread nonetheless.

Regards...



I always suspected the photos of Tseung, Asashoryu, or Hakuho, were not actually him really doesn't really matter...I...alias

Asashoryu vs. Hakuho for all the marbles was billed as the ultimate possible match in the two-day Grand Sumo Tournament in Hawaii.