The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Koen1]

i do not know if The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory is correct or not, i do know that is better to attack a theory with your own ideas, not like a monkee,

Which is why you start harassing me when I poke fun of Tseung, while you apparently do not see how ludicrous his stories are...? Seems like the action of someone who did not think about the entire thing before starting to "attack" me about it... So once again you are talking bullshit.

i have made few posts in this topic to talk about the electrinium, but no one attack that theory like you did in page 9 of Cystal Hutchison topic

I did not "attack" anything, you came into our thread and started implying that that Electrinium theory was fantastic, whereas we had already discussed that
theory in detail both in the htread and outside of it, and had come to the conclusion (which accords with the past 50 years of electrodynamics and quantumelectrodynamics as well as semiconductor crystal science) that the Electrinium theory is nice but seems to go off track here and there and to
our experience does not work exactly as the author claimed. Not surprising that nobody has ever heard anything from him ever again.
I merely told you very elaborately what I thought of the theory and why, in order to make you understand why we were not at all so enthousiastic
about the theory as you were.
You completely misinterpreted that as an "attack" on that theory, which is nonsense, because it is simply an explanation of my view on that theory.
For some reason you seem to find it outrageous that I dare to have formed an actual opinion about that theory, and you seem unable to understand the
theory and subject matter well enough to understand that my opinion on that theory is not just some wild antagonism but actually founded in fact.
Well, that is a limitation on your part.
If you choose not to even want to understand and choose to label a very dodgy theory as the ultimate truth while hardly any research or evidence supports
the claims, and you choose to dismiss someones analysis of that dodgy theory based on actual scientific research and empirical evidence,
then that is your right but do not try to twist the story to make it look like I am attacking anyone. That's just silly. You came into our thread with a vague
theory that we had already discussed, I gave you a very elaborate analysis of what we had concluded, and you twist it into an "attack". Nonsense.

Koen1 you had attack Arthur P. Summera theory, he worked 50 years on that, and give us all his knowledges, and you pretend that he his a liar and a non sincere scientist, you better suppose that electrinium is right and test it !

No, it's the other way around.
Arthur Summera wrote a vague theory, never managed to build a working Electrinium unit based on his theory,
nobody else managed to build one either, and mr Summera is nowhere to be found, nobody knows where he went what happened and
why his theory died. There is no proof of him being a scientist at all, nor of the electrinium theory being correct, nor of it ever having been tested!
It is you who are pretending that these things are true.
I am just being very sober and looking at this with a critical eye, instead of an eye blurred by extremist unfounded wishfull thinking.

In that respect you do fit nicely together with Larry Tseung.
The two of you should start a club of people who choose to believe in their own fantasies instead of actual scientific fact.

I know, why don't you and Tseung go search for Summera in Tseungs flying overunity saucer antigravity device craft?
And please stop harassing me.

[Devil]

Tseung, you finally attack, attack and attack.

The battlefield is the Institute of Energy at Hong Kong University.   Let me analyze your chances of winning this battle.

(1) You have three invincible weapons: the Lee-Tseung pulled pendulum, the silly spaceship2.jpg and Mutual Credits.  You will use them.  You will be able to present without disruption.  The information is available already in
http://www.energyfromair.com/IOE_talk/.  There is zero chance of any debunker capable of arguing against these weapons.

(2) The place is Hong Kong University.  They would have contacted Tsinghua and Shenzhen Universities.  Some participants might have even attended those seminars.  Many participants would have read and studied the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory previously.  The questions will be polite and academically interesting.

(3) The invitation from the Institute of Energy, a non-profit organization, is a great help.  You are sharing the knowledge freely.  There is no solicitation of investment and hence no possibility of fraud.

(4) The timing is just before the fifth AERO Conference in USA at the end of June.  (http://www.aeroconference.com)  The same or even more powerful information will come out.  They will have working prototypes that use your theory.  The Hong Kong News Media will have confirmation from USA and continued stories.  The chance of follow-up interviews is assured.

(5) The emphasis on ?O-Level Physics? will get many students excited.  So long as the News Media quote the website http://www.energyfromair.com/IOE_talk/ and this forum, you can reach your target of 1 million Hong Kong students.

(6) Make sure you train up many more presenters and do the follow-ups.  Include Taiwan, Macau in addition to the many Cities in China in your coming lecture tours.  Make sure that you have presenters in USA, Europe, Japan, Australia, etc.

(7) Once this battle is won, prepare for the next one ? have working prototypes and promoting the inventors.  Be focused.  Win this battle first.

[Dogen]

Dear Mr. Tseung.

Thank you for trying to make free energy known to the world. The status quo is on its last feet and i am sure free energy will be the final blow.

To all people reading this thread.......imagine your an oilcompany, imagine Tesla going around talking about free energy, imagine your oilcompany profits going down the drain.

What oww what would you do, being an oilcompany and all? Its really simple people, come on, its no physics!

Suppress it like theres no tomorrow 

Ill be outside, enjoying the sun providing me with free heat!

[Drannom]

FAQ1:

1) When did you last have a brain scan?
2) How bad was it?
3) Did they perhaps diagnose severe Korsakov syndrome?
4) Did they perhaps diagnose severe Creutzfelt-Jacob syndrome?
5) Did they perhaps perform a partial lobotomy?
6) Have you ever hit your head very very hard, possibly around the age of 13?
7) Have you ever fallen head-first onto your chop sticks, accidentally
jamming one up your nose too deep?
8 ) Have you perhaps been consuming too much lead in your food? In that
respect you may be right in that it is wise to get the "lead out".
9) Do you have any sense of reality?
10) From which asylum did you escape?

Some members call you intelligent man, intelligent man without an heart means nothing, you have wrote this post to make Larry feel very bad, i feel the horror of your fun, to be fun it must be fun for all, not for some players without idea to figth another idea, if this topic is nonsense then quit, leave it, bye bye

otherwise i do understand the electrinium, still i am not an english spokeman i can elaborate on it, those who had red electrinium.pdf will get their own view on it

we are here to create, reproduce, and look what seems good, not to destroy...


Koen1 you'll have to apologize for that terrific post !

[Top Gun]

those who had red electrinium.pdf will get their own view on it

we are here to create, reproduce, and look what seems good, not to destroy...
Koen1 you'll have to apologize for that terrific post !

Dear Drannom,

I have now had a chance to read and study the information in
http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/electrinium.pdf

I had to admit that Nikola Tesla was well ahead of his time.  The energy he referred to as the Central Sun and described it as atomic energy in the sense that it was related to the electrons moving around the nuclei.

Mr. Arthur P. Summera described it in one set of language and talked about the electrinium battery that could provide infinite energy.  Such a notion was rejected by those physicists who believed that such a device violated the Law of Conservation of Energy.

The Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory described the extraction of gravitational and electron motion energy via pulsed (Lee-Tseung pulled) oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux changes.  I am now comparing the Central Sun Energy concept of Tesla and the Electron Motion Energy from Lee-Tseung.  I believe that they are talking about the same thing with different language descriptions.

Mr. Tseung is likely to get the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory accepted with his attack, attack and attack strategy.  The Devil pointed out the invincible weapon ?It is the vertical component of the tension times the vertical displacement that gives the work done by Gravity.?  This weapon leads via the Ms. Forever Yuen magnetic pendulum experiment to extracting electron motion energy.  That cannot be wrong.  In this aspect, Lee-Tseung cannot be wrong.  This means Nikola Tesla cannot be wrong.

Central Sun Energy Concept = Electron Motion Energy Concept!