The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Devil]

Tseung et al, now that your prototype is demonstrating overunity and generating more than 50 watts, I would like to analyze why you succeeded while so many others failed.
The reasons are:
1.    You have the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out Energy theory to explain the source of energy to your machines.  Most other inventors copied or modified the work of others.  They might have observed a glimpse of overunity by hitting on the right pulsing frequency for a particular configuration.
2.   Your ignoring negative feedback and insults.  At least one-third of the posts in this forum are insults or irrelevant comments.  The average person would get offended and quit.
3.   Your seeing Dr. Liang, Wang Shenhe and the 225 HP Pulse Motor team in person.  Even though you do not have their inventions to take apart, you learn much from speaking to these pioneers directly.  Your absolute conviction that the 225 HP Pulse Motor is not a hoax is a good example.
4.   Your not working for the Government is a blessing.  Many top scientists doing better job than you et al were gagged because of the top-secret nature of the project.
5.   Your luck in finding Tong Po Chi and your quick realization that the building prototype task cannot be entrusted to non-experts.
6.   Your good intention of benefiting the World.  Some inventors might have hit on similar findings but they wanted to keep such findings secret so that they can get wealthy. 
7.   Your own hard work and brilliance.  Every Physics student learns the Parallelogram of Forces and the concept of force, displacement and energy.  None applied them the way you do.
8.   The most important defense is your demonstrating that the Law of Conservation of Energy is not violated in the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out theory.  That nullified or removed the weapon that destroyed so many others.
9. Your not giving up no matter what happens.  The average would have quit when suspected or accused as Foreign Agent!

[Paul-R]

Possible first draft logic for the programming of the Pulse Motor....

Very useful stuff.

Presumably you will have an input/output board, and this I/O card would sit in the
computer. The speed sensor would, I presume, be a voltage which would end up in
a memory location in the computer. It would be handy, at some point, to have a temperature
sensor located somewhere appropriate, so that if the machine ran out of control, this sensor
would be used to shut down all inputs. (Also something to detect vibration, an accelerometer
of some sort, so that if there were excessive vibration, all inputs would shut down).

Paul.

[ltseung888]

The presentation at the Institute of Energy in Hong Kong

There were 9 participants â€" Seven Engineers and two financial persons.  Mr. Miller Tong gave the presentation.  It was a repeat of the presentation at the Hong Kong Inventions Association.  Miller and Forever did the dry run the day before and the presentation was a success.

The Engineers paid much attention to the Lead-Out theory and the prototype.  They all understood the Lead-Out theory easily.  Many have heard or read the information via friends or via the Internet.  They were also interested in the Flying Saucer Theory and Prototype but the decision was to focus on the Lead-Out Energy this time.  The discussion on the Flying Saucer will be covered in the Meeting next month.

They all “hand-feel” the rotating shaft.  They all believe that the torque was considerable.  The two output measurement technique was discussed â€" prony   technique and the 0.5 HP generator.  Most feel that the 0.5 HP generator technique would be more conclusive as that would have enough power to recharge the 12V battery.

One of the financial persons was the owner of a few factories in China.  He is interested in producing the products.  The likely product to be produced is likely to be the Educational DIY Device.  More discussions will follow.

I still believe that the DIY device is a better approach than simply providing information on the Internet.  The demand for accuracy is beyond the capability of simple hand-tools.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[ltseung888]

Some Comments
One request from a participant at the Institute of Energy presentation was to reduce the size of the prototype to about half.  He believed that a smaller prototype would be easier to carry â€" especially on planes.

The reasons for rejecting such a request are as follows:

1.   The Lead-Out theory demands a larger diameter to lead-out more energy.
2.   There should be a reasonable time between pulses â€" so that the pulse could move the wheel a certain distance to supply the tangential energy.  This tangential energy would lead-out more gravitational and magnetic energy.
3.   If the diameter is larger, more coils and magnets can be fitted.
4.   From the experience of the 225 HP Pulse Motor, the diameter is at least three times our present prototype, the batteries are 24 Volts, the number of coils is 12 and 9 slides were used.
5.   From the Bedini implementation as described in the Internet, the successful ones are using large diameters.


There are three parallel paths for us:
1.   Do a larger prototype with 16 coils.
2.   Do an educational product similar to the present prototype
3.   Do the laser implementation (with more unknowns)

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[Cloxxki]

Lawrence, is it possible to make a mechanically driven lead-out machine?

I'm envisioning an inpout drive shaft, wound would a string, from which a weigh is hung. The output shaft as observer have been able to touch, would be lifting a greater weight, at a greater rate.
Taking motors and batteries out of the equasion should help you gain the support you seek.

Thanks,