Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

gaby de wilde

Quote from: acerzw on October 28, 2007, 02:51:17 PM
This thread ......

Your review is not worth reading.

Please try again.
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

gaby de wilde

Quote from: ltseung888 on October 28, 2007, 06:15:32 PM
Let me put my understanding of Gaby's Improvement in pictorial form.

A = rotating inner cylinder in the clockwise direction
B = non-rotating ring of coils that can be switched on and off
C = non-rotating ring of permanent magnets suggested by Gaby.

With the magnetic poles as shown, if the coil in B has current off, the permanent magnet in C will induce a S pole (in coil at B) facing the rotating magnets in A.  This effectively causes an attraction with the next coming permanent magnet in A (which is beneficial) causing further force to turn the cylinder A in the clockwise direction.

The permanent magnet in C does not draw any current.  Gaby has improved the efficiency of the device!

This multiple ring concept is getting closer to the John Searl device.  Let us have more of these brilliant ideas.

Lawrence Tseung
Gaby?s brilliant ideas Lead Out resonance from equally brilliant minds.


http://www.metacafe.com/watch/665396/how_increase_speed_of_electric_motor/
How Increase Speed Of Electric Motor Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cevznlUzmK0&eurl=http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?t=5
YouTube - second motor in testing

:)
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

gaby de wilde

I think this is (just) a good way to illustrate the concept.



The other side of the coil can also be used. The force is available so it's wasteful not to use it.



This does not pull the rotor parallel to it's rim. So I've designed this sandwich.



The idea is the spin the top and the bottom disks in opposite direction (it would be interesting to speculate on spinning the center disk also)

By spinning both disks in opposite direction the forces on the wheel point round the rim and those working on the frame cancel out.

:)
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

gaby de wilde

Quote from: ltseung888 on October 24, 2007, 07:41:11 AM
Gaby,

There were indeed stories of perpetual motion machines in China since ancient times.

I'm so happy I asked about this....

QuoteThere are a few that I could quote on top of my head:

(1) The 15 bucket water wheel.  ä¸Æ'上八落的水車  This water wheel was supposed to have 7 buckets going up and 8 coming down.  This water wheel could raise water up from a lake or pond with no water movement.  The details of the construction was lost but I am confident that it could be reproduced.  I did the first draft of a possible design using the Lee-Tseung theory on the train from Beijing back to Hong Kong in 2006.

Some days ago I dream of a device with buckets sliding over the arms.  The 7 buckets swing while going upwards the 8 hang still while going down. There is something else going on in the picture. I'm sure I will envision the whole apparatus some time soon.  :)

Quote(2) The wooden ox and the floating horse.  三åÅ"‹æâ,,¢â€šÃ¤Â»Â£Ã§Å¡â€žÃ¦Å"¨ç‰›æµé¦¬ These devices were supposed to be produced during the war periods of the Three Kingdom.  The wheels were not circular.  They were unbalanced wheels!  I am confident that they could be reproduced.  They were slow even though that they moved "automatically" with some guidance.  The Lee-Tseung theory indeed could be used to help to recreate these devices.

oh, I'm laughing my ass off reading the pages about this. From here

QuoteEven if their was some truth to it, its still very exgrated in the book. It was said if you twisted the tounges a certian way they wouldn't move, twisted them another and they would. This supossivly made it so if the oxen were going to be captured Shu would just twist their tongues and run, so the enemy couldn't use them.

ok, 1) The enemy didn't know how to use the devices.

QuoteThe wooden ox, like many other things in the novel, is much exagerated from history. The simple reason why a wooden ox cannot operate is because it has no source of motion. In the book it is described that the wooden ox can move on its own, which is propostrous from a physical stand point, since where does it get the energy needed to move?

2) physics without evidence again.

QuoteThe author was selling out on Zhuge Liang's reputation as an inventor. He did in fact invent a few things, such as the Kong Ming Light (hot air balloon, used for signalling), the Kong Ming Crossbow (rapid fire), the Bed Ballista, etc. However, a lot of the weapons he supposedly used against the Southern Barbarians and the Wei were made up as well.

So he invented the rapid fire ballista, the hot air balloon and the gravity motor.  some quack eh?

QuoteWell, the offfical histories record that Zu Chongzhi, a scientific genius of the 5th century, reconstructed Zhuge Liang's wooden ox. So it must have existed in some form. The normal wheelbarrow was too common at that time to be such a big deal, so perhaps it was an improved kind of wheelbarrow. That's the theory that is most widely supported in the academic world, anyway.

debunk working replications?

QuoteZu was born in Jiankang. His family had historically been involved in astronomy research, and from childhood Zu was exposed to both astronomy and mathematics. When he was only a youth his talent earned him much repute. When Emperor Xiaowu of Liu Song heard of him, he was sent to an Academy, the Hualin Xuesheng (華æžâ€"å­¸çÅ"), and later at the Imperial Nanjing University (Zongmingguan) to perform research.

So, he is recorded as a genious of noteworthy magnitude. This is overunity.com here he must be called a quack. Right kids? He just lied about his replcation.  He must have! Physics doesn't allow for any rational reasoning. It demands we label things as quackery.

Then a poster says:

QuoteThis isn't a modern invention btw, it's been around for ages. A simple 2 or 4 legged mechanical device hinged at the center.

Perhaps what Zhuge Liang developed was what is now called "Passive-dynamic walkers"?

I saw simple toy models of these in Japan, supposedly traditional children's toys.

oh, like this you mean?

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~shc/movies/2WalksAngle.mpg
2WalksAngle.mpg (video/mpeg Object)

hahahahaha



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zu_Chongzhi
Zu Chongzhi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://groups.csail.mit.edu/locomotion/publications/flamingo05.pdf
flamingo05.pdf (application/pdf Object)

http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/locomotion_and_robotics/history.htm
History of Passive Dynamics & Toys

http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/st/2005-07/29/content_3281644.htm
èâ,¬ÂÃ¦Å"¨åÅ' è‡ªæ¯”諸葛亮 èâ,¬â€"æâ,,¢â€š4年再現æÅ"¨ç‰›æµé¦¬(Ã¥Å"â€")

amazing!

Dutch warlord Theo Jansen builds an impressive war ox

http://www.glumbert.com/media/kineticsculpture
glumbert - Kinetic Sculpture

Quote(3) There are over 60 China Patents or Applications related to perpetual motions if you do a patent search using the Chinese Characters of Perpetual Motion Machine 永動機.  Some other China Patents did not use the term 永動機 but from their descriptions, it was obvious that they implied Perpetual Motion.

(4) Lee Cheung Kin and I appeared in front of the China Patent Office to explain our Lee-Tseung theory.  We got good reception (and recommendation to visit Tsing Hua University).  I am confident that the China Patent Office has extremely competent Scientists who can follow our explanations.

(5) The recent meeting with the top research institutes confirmed my belief.  China just sent its Moon Exploration Rocket this evening (live on the 6:00pm News in Hong Kong).  One of their representatives told us that they had strong interest in our technology.  (I hope China will send a Flying Saucer to the Moon first.)

Lawrence Tseung
The many know-it-all debunkers in the West Lead Out high roadblocks for the Cosmic Energy Developers.

A good heart leads out positive memories.

Hope you are doing ok Lawrence...

blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

ltseung888

Since I do not reply to private email requests, the post is answered here:

Quote
Dear Sir; I'm interested in trying to build a prototype.
Could you please send the AVSEQ02.DAT and a copy of the CD.  Thank you.

XXX
USA

Reference;

The prototypes in the videos show that we can indeed extract energy directly from Gravity without violating the Law of Conservation of Energy.  In particular, the file AVSEQ02.DAT was produced in February 2000.  Thus we have prototypes that support the theories and the claims in our PCT and China Patent Application.  You are welcome to freely copy and circulate the CD as copies of it were distributed to the Public at the 2006 China Venture Forum on April 6-8 in Shenzhen, China.  Please email ltseung@hotmail.com if you want to get a copy of the CD.

The CD has been sent via snake mail.  A condensed version of the Dr. Liang video (AVSEQO2.DAT) by Ms. Forverve Yuen is already available on this thread.

Please participate in this forum and share your expertise.


Compressible Fluids are Mechanical Energy Carriers. Air is not a fuel but is an energy carrier. (See reply 1097)
Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux change systems.  We need to apply pulse force (Lee-Tseung Pulls) at the right time. (See reply 1106 and 2621)
1150 describes the Flying Saucer.  This will provide incredible prosperity.  Beware of the potential destructive powers.