The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Calm down. 

I would like to focus on Mathematics and Physics.

The spreadsheet so far covers the use of non-ideal Lee-Tseung Pulls using horizontal forces.

It reveals the concept of Lead Out.

Now, we discovered the ideal Lee-Tseung Pulls.
(I had to admit, some of the insulting comments helped.)

The World Energy Crisis is over,  We can improve the many hundred OU inventions.

Regards,

Lawrence Tseung
The Ideal Lee-Tseung Pull not only explains Lead Out but can predict improvements
with higher accuracy and clarity.

[ltseung888]

Even before the vigorous mathematics, we can tell something about the ideal Lee-Tseung Pulls.

(1) The horizontal force treatment was definitely not ideal.

(2) The ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is perpendicular to radius or tangential.

(3) It implies that Periodic Forces on a rotating balanced wheel should not be
elastic collisions.

(4) These Forces must impart energy or accelerate the rotation.  They
must be applied at the right time.

(5) Applying the Forces incorrectly will not lead out the expected energies.

This is why tuning is so important in OU device development.

After the vigorous mathematical treatment, I shall focus on the best ways
to apply the Lee-Tseung Pull.  I may not have the perfect answer initially but
I am confident that I am along the right path.

Lawrence Tseung
Working continuously on imperfect solutions Leads Out closer to ideal solutions.

[chrisC]

Did anyone catch this little gem?  Very typical.  Lawrence makes wild claim.  Can it be tested?  Why no, because it is almost impossible to apply the ideal Lee-Tseung pull.  So whatever observations you see that may counter the theory can easily be explained away - the pull was incorrect.

Lawrence, cut the crap.  I have glanced through the thread history, and it is all talk.  The burden of proof is always on the person making the outlandish claim. Put up or shut up.  Show a "Lee-Tseung Pull" that results in more energy in the system that can be explained by the energy imparted in the pull. I am willing to bet my last dime that a clear and verifyable demonstration of this will never happen and can never happen.

The purported devices will always be promised to be out next year some time.  Then, due to some minor setback, the release will always be pushed to one year later.

And what about the AERO competition?  What technical glitch will be excuse for the no show?  The famous Steorn hot bearings are always a good one.

I said that it was almost impossible to measure a single ideal Lee-Tseung Pull.

.....

The CIA or the Like asked us to shut up and tempted us each with USD12 million.  We even signed a contract.  Will I ever listen to the CIA or the
Like again?  When I feel I have something to share, I post.  We impressed the Chinese Authorities.  That is good enough for me.

Lawrence Tseung

And why would the CIA even offer a dollar to a totally unknown 'researcher' with no merits? It's all in your mind Lawrence. It's not like the US Goverment was buying Von Braun's rocket expertise and forgiving his Nazi connections. Common Lawrence, you are so full of CRAP! Aren't you ashamed to represent the Chinese people?

chrisC

[ltseung888]

Dear ChrisC,

Thank you for your continued Insult Training.

I was in Macau yesterday - the Las Vegas of the East.  The main purpose was to watch the exhibition tennis match.

The boat trip from Hong Kong to Macau was about one hour.  Sitting next to us were some young men
who like loud discussions.  Their conversation has some interesting implications.

Person A: "The economy of Macau boomed.  It has overtaken Las Vegas as the Gambling Center of the
World.  The average income has overtaken Hong Kong.  Gambling is good for Macau."

Person B: "Gambling is morally wrong.  The Macau Government is poisoning its citizens.  It has done
great harm to China.  Much money laundary was done.  Gambling is no good for Macau.  It corrupts the
Moral Fibric."

Person A: "Is the average person in Macau better off now?  Has he got a better place to live?  Has he
got more money in the Bank?  Has he and his family got more opportunities in life?"

Person B: "You cannot use something morally wrong to justify the boom.  Macau could use other ways
to develop its economy.  Wrong is Wrong."

*** It is clear that there are different opinions in this World.  Different people view the same events
differently.

I look at the Mathematics and Physics.  They cannot lie.  They clearly predict that we can Lead Out
the gravitational and electron motion energy that are surrounding us.  It will solve the Energy Crisis.
It will start a new era of prosperity and challenge.  New opportunities are coming.

Some view it differently.

Lawrence Tseung
There will always be difference in opinion.  Just treat them as Insult Training.  Focus on benefiting
the World.

[utilitarian]

Dear ChrisC,

Thank you for your continued Insult Training.

....................

I look at the Mathematics and Physics.  They cannot lie.  They clearly predict that we can Lead Out
the gravitational and electron motion energy that are surrounding us.  It will solve the Energy Crisis.
It will start a new era of prosperity and challenge.  New opportunities are coming.

Some view it differently.

Lawrence Tseung
There will always be difference in opinion.  Just treat them as Insult Training.  Focus on benefiting
the World.

Another common tactic - calling valid criticism insults.

I see you have more theory talk but still not a single demonstration.  If you what you say is so basic, why not show a pendulum pull that "leads out" energy that can be measured to be in excess of the energy of the pull?  Still can't do it?  Come on, just one "Lee-Tseung pull."  Give the crowd something besides communist demagoguery.  Or do they decide laws of physics in China through legislation?