The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Dear Lawrence,

The science that you have proven is called evaporation

The wetting of the tissue paper is called condensation.

But after you have done the experiment, you will call that wetting by water droplets.

Are you helping Hans out with his lost US$10 bet?

Lawrence Tseung
The CIA or the Like agents better help the poor Hans.  Additional education will cost him more.

[Koen1]

Great.
Again a whole lot of talk and absolutely no substantiation of the story except a pic of a group of unknown people (save one), and again absolutely no proof.

This was supposed to prove Hans' analysis wrong?
How exactly?

(1) When the water rate was increased, a large column of water accumulated at the bottom.

(2) We just could not pump air+water up.  When someone strong used all his might to step on it, the US$1.00 pump bursted.

Right. So what exactly were you pumping up before you tried to pump air+water? You know, the part of the experiment where you claim the tissue got wet?
Was that not air+water? If it was only air, the tissue could not have gotten wet.
But if I read your story correctly, you were in fact pumping air through the tube at a steady rate, before you started introducing small water drops into the air stream?
That is not at all comparable to pumping large volumes of water up 100 meters! It is comparable to throwing a few drops of water into the wind, which will get carried along with the wind. And that only works when the air flows fast enough and the amount of water is relatively tiny.

You have not proven anything. And it is the 100th time you have not proven anything. It is getting old now.

Hans does not at all owe you anything, even if he had agreed to a bet.
You still owe us proof, to make up for the time we lost listening to your ranting.

Perhaps you should try a better antipsychotic? Or maybe you can get some dried frog pills at the corner shop? That might help.

[Grumpy]

Actually air can carry water up and has been used as an inexpensive means for irrigating pots for 100+ years.  Not sure if it would work for 34 floors, but don't see why it would not.  Pressure on the walls of a tube this long are high - was the tube reinforced?  I have some clear tube that is reinforced , crossed both ways - good stuff.

Tube diameter is important and smaller bubbles carry more water upwards, or something like that - can;t remember exactly.  I ran across this when I was gathering info for a hydrophonic garden in a greenhouse.

[ltseung888]

Actually air can carry water up and has been used as an inexpensive means for irrigating pots for 100+ years.  Not sure if it would work for 34 floors, but don't see why it would not.  Pressure on the walls of a tube this long are high - was the tube reinforced?  I have some clear tube that is reinforced , crossed both ways - good stuff.

Tube diameter is important and smaller bubbles carry more water upwards, or something like that - can;t remember exactly.  I ran across this when I was gathering info for a hydrophonic garden in a greenhouse.

The tube was reinforced.  When I bought it, I just wanted it not to break when stretched.  Later, we had a rope next to it and tied the one-way valves to the rope.  Thus the tension was at the rope and not the one-way valve joints.

You are also right on the smaller diameter tube carrying water bubbles to greater heights.  However, after you introduced the one-way valves, the scenario changed.  The type and spacing of one-way valves became more important.

How is your reading on 643 and 758?

Lawrence Tseung
Use of one-way valves changed everything. 

[ltseung888]

This was supposed to prove Hans' analysis wrong?
How exactly? *** Hans failed to consider the effect of one-way valves.

(1) When the water rate was increased, a large column of water accumulated at the bottom.

(2) We just could not pump air+water up.  When someone strong used all his might to step on it, the US$1.00 pump bursted.

Right. So what exactly were you pumping up before you tried to pump air+water? You know, the part of the experiment where you claim the tissue got wet?
Was that not air+water? If it was only air, the tissue could not have gotten wet. ***It was air+water vapor.  Since both are gases, height is irrelevant. 
But if I read your story correctly, you were in fact pumping air through the tube at a steady rate, before you started introducing small water drops into the air stream? *** Yes.  That part was to show that water could be sent up even to 100 floors or over 300 meters if we did not care about the rate.

That is not at all comparable to pumping large volumes of water up 100 meters! It is comparable to throwing a few drops of water into the wind, which will get carried along with the wind. And that only works when the air flows fast enough and the amount of water is relatively tiny.
***Yes.  But the next part is to add the many one-way valves.  Once you added the one-way valves, you deliver water droplets.  Please read up on the operation of one-way valves.  I might have to break one apart in a future post.

One-way valves. One-way valves. One-way valves.