Rotational PMM by wizkycho

[hartiberlin]

http://starglider.netfirms.com/RPMMonly.html

@wizkycho 

When you move the shield you wil have to use more force, cause you want to move the shield
also out of the attraction of the rotor magnet.
So EnergyIN is higher than you think !

So I don?t know, if this is really better than the linear version.

Regards, Stefan.

[ooandioo]

The different forces that attract here are hard to imagine...

Don't you think that there also is an attraction between the shield and the inner magnets, when inner magnets are forced to follow the shield cycling?
This force would count towards the F needed to rotate the shield...

Mh, need a practical sample.

-- Andi

[ooandioo]

http://starglider.netfirms.com/RPMMonly.html

Right what i say...

-- Andi

@wizkycho

When you move the shield you wil have to use more force, cause you want to move the shield
also out of the attraction of the rotor magnet.
So EnergyIN is higher than you think !

So I don?t know, if this is really better than the linear version.

Regards, Stefan.

[m668004]

I think the attraction between the shielding and the inner magnets are not the problem, because the inner magnets move always parallel to the shielding and not perpendicular. Look at Butch Lafontes Device. A problem would appear if the inner magnets were moved totally out of the shielding but that can't happen because of the repelling forces of the outer magnets.

M.

[Light]

In God's sake, Wizk, WHY the rotor's magnet will follow the "screen"? System is closed, they (rotor and screen) just attract each other and all system will stop.

"THIS STILL WORKS VERY VERY GOOD, COME AND STOP IT".
Even if you buy a ticket for me, I won't go to waste time, couse it will not (and can not) ?work this way.