Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

Started by giantkiller, September 22, 2007, 12:39:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

sparks

@GK

    Would you describe the energy produced by the kick windings as a scalar em wave or as alecks calls it a dcacoustic wave?  I was going to do an experiment to see if there is any gain when a scalar wave (assuming I can produce one)  influences a second coil.  I believe that a scalar empulse confines itself to spacetime coordinates and does not really radiate.  The apparent radiation is from other inertial fields traversing the scalar wave coordinates.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

aleks

Quote from: sparks on April 07, 2008, 10:51:09 AMThe apparent radiation is from other inertial fields traversing the scalar wave coordinates.
I think the same. When you are 'catching' scalar wave you are actually catching local perturbation that scalar wave (DC acoustic wave) causes. The same is true for creating DC acoustic wave. You are creating a specific explosive or implosive perturbation by mechanical or electric means, which produces non-equilibrium conditions that can be defined as a sum of elementary sinusoidal kinetic vibrations that are "born" in the center of the perturbation. But what's important is that this sum of kinetic vibrations at time 0 also contains DC component which "falls off" from standard kinetic waves propagation paradigm. Of course, other frequencies then start to propagate in a normal fashion. So, I believe this DC component energy is something severely overlooked by contemporary physics as it is an inherent component of any "sharp" (explosive or implosive) non-equilibrium conditions, if equilibrium is later re-gained by means of kinetic wave propagation.

giantkiller

Quote from: sparks on April 07, 2008, 10:51:09 AM
@GK

    Would you describe the energy produced by the kick windings as a scalar em wave or as alecks calls it a dcacoustic wave?  I was going to do an experiment to see if there is any gain when a scalar wave (assuming I can produce one)  influences a second coil.  I believe that a scalar empulse confines itself to spacetime coordinates and does not really radiate.  The apparent radiation is from other inertial fields traversing the scalar wave coordinates.

I would say from the size of a 4" coil that 2 amps would produce a field at some distance. The reason I don't give a distance because something negligable at 6" away will produce other ranges of ranges of harmonics or products that the standard desktop environment would not be able to track. There would be results of very low power but I would like to see what the mixing results would be on a micro scale. The only way I can put is:
You drop 3 stones in water at really close timimg but not the same. The concentric waves interfere at different times. Quite complex. One stone's pattern looks more powerfull to another stone's pattern.
You would get standing, moving, cancelled waves.
Put this in multiple EM generation fields for a 3d environment like 2 Tesla coils and a moving transducer and you have a very wide range of interference points with heterodyning and harmonics. All going away from their source and returning at different and like times while intersecting a very large number of interactions in 3d space. Try to count those.
To answer your question is 'you will not only generate what you are talking about but much , much more'. There simply is too much going on. It is impossible not to in a loud / high amperage and noisy / many frequencies setup.
What we have seen in John Hutchison's demos is the result of moving sources. But some of his best results are when we don't see the generators... I contend those don't move in those setups. ;)
I am going by only the aparent visuals. Frequencies turned on, things move. Keeping it simple.

Anyone of us can get the frequencies. Pump up the amps, raise the mass then you have Wardenclyffe. Get three of those going and the Prestige doesn't look that fantastic anymore. The idea is to get a frequency at a higher exponent than the atomic complacency of the target mass.

--giantkiller. I got another 3d model movie I will draw up. I won't be a total sum of what is mentioned but a good visual none the less.

aleks

Quote from: giantkiller on April 07, 2008, 10:42:00 AMI put buzzmags inside along the coil edge to magnify the sound. The tweeting and chattering were quite prominent.
Maybe using a sealed ferro-magnetic powder core could help boost additional OU watts from the system?