Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


TPU - General Discussion

Started by z_p_e, October 01, 2007, 11:32:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

z_p_e

Hi Robert.

I agree with you on all counts, but consider this:

1) Are the kicks created by the RMF, or is the RMF created by the kicks?

2) The kicks and RMF are not necessarily co-dependent ;)

dutchy1966

Quote from: z_p_e on October 02, 2007, 12:17:32 PM
Hi Robert.

I agree with you on all counts, but consider this:

1) Are the kicks created by the RMF, or is the RMF created by the kicks?

2) The kicks and RMF are not necessarily co-dependent ;)

Hi Darren,

I'm pretty sure it is like the RMF creates the kicks. I say this because SM tells us how IT IS possible to create a RMF with the right combination of frequencies. That basically tells us that is what the three frequwencies are for; creating the RMF. Therefore it only leaves the option of the kicks beiong created from the RMF. It also matches better with the examples of the magnet swiping over a wire that SM has given.

Robert

tao

Quote from: z_p_e on October 01, 2007, 11:32:43 PM
Why have they done all this?

Two reasons immediately come to mind:

1) To protect UEC's IP investment.
2) Because the device's technology is perhaps new and novel, but not that difficult or complicated.

It can't be that difficult or complicated. LOOK AT THE DEVICES! I would even go out on a limb and say that most folks are achieving overkill in terms of complexity and "drive power".

Cheers,
Darren
Quote from: z_p_e on October 02, 2007, 08:32:34 AM
wattsup.

I have no doubts about the authenticity of SM and the TPU, therefore I am not the best person to be discussing "fake" theories with.

In regards to the use of the "primary" and "secondary" frequencies, I've mentioned this before, but no one seems to catch on.

The minimum number of collectors for a working TPU is one. The first TPU1 unit has one collector, one feedback coil. The TPU2 unit has 4 collectors and 4 feedback coils (4 TPU1's integrated into one package). The cut TPU had 2 collectors, but I am uncertain of how many feedback coils it had. The larger 17" TPU most likely has 2 collectors as well, judging by the fact that two feedback coils are present (the two small toroids).

So the TPU17 contains 2 separate TPU units in one package. Each operates at its own set of 3 frequencies. All 6 frequencies are related. This is for better control of higher power units. Primary frequencies = F1, F2, F3; Secondary frequencies = F4, F5, F6.

You could have as many collector coils or complete separate units that you like in one package, but it would become increasingly difficult to control. 3 units is probably a practical maximum, but certainly not required to make it operational.


Nice synopsis...

I agree with your points, especially the 'drive power' one...

EMdevices

I like this re-assesment of the TPU Darren.  We need to do that once in a while.

We need to step back and re-assess what we know.

We need to step back and re-assess the theories.

We need to step back and re-view the videos.

Periodicaly!!!   LOL  :)

EM

tao

Quote from: EMdevices on October 02, 2007, 05:42:36 PM
I like this re-assesment of the TPU Darren.  We need to do that once in a while.

We need to step back and re-assess what we know.

We need to step back and re-assess the theories.

We need to step back and re-view the videos.

Periodicaly!!!   LOL  :)

EM

I've been doing that for some years now, LOL...

One day my friends, we will solve it...