Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?

[RadiantEnRg]

@ Tinu...you must not know where to look.
My circuit like I said is not grounded..however, I understand that the field field is in the room with me...that's why i devised this test to prove to all it IS NOT PARASITIC C that is behind the one wire illumination. Come look at my Proof2 video...and you may be able to see the Radiant


Here's my proof that this in an influx of radiant energy!!!   http://www.youtube.com/v/oIidGfe0sPM


As for the pyrosol tests...I will get back to them shortly, as I have shown this is all about R...specifically negative R...So I am interested in making more beads to use as the R, instead of me

[jeffc]

@ Tinu...you must not know where to look.
My circuit like I said is not grounded..however, I understand that the field field is in the room with me...that's why i devised this test to prove to all it IS NOT PARASITIC C that is behind the one wire illumination. Come look at my Proof2 video...and you may be able to see the Radiant


Here's my proof that this in an influx of radiant energy!!!   http://www.youtube.com/v/oIidGfe0sPM


As for the pyrosol tests...I will get back to them shortly, as I have shown this is all about R...specifically negative R...So I am interested in making more beads to use as the R, instead of me

@RadiantEnRg

Great video!  Please bear with everyone as attempts to disprove are presented.  Your findings are exciting, and become more convincing over time.  Although it must not be easy to have potential "flaws" pointed out, your ability to work with this online team to rule out these things is going to make a huge difference in how quickly your discoveries are accepted.

I've seen some great minds on this forum, and I think you will soon find they will be assisting in replications which will help further your efforts. 

Thanks again for the continued investigation, openness with the details, and videos.

Regards,
jeffc

[RadiantEnRg]

@ JeffC....Thx, I am glad you appreciate my experiments, my willingness to divulge info, and the videos
I don't mind people trying to rationalize my experiences against what they have been taught. I guess I have the benefit of not being trained the "right" way lol. I understand where they are coming from, it's like me, I used to believe the Twin Towers were brought down by a kerosene fire....pshhh...lol, but with time people will slowly come around, especially with the help of the internet!!...We shall use the machine to rid ourselves of the "Whore of Babylon"...a lil bible refrence lol....But yeah...I hope we all can work together and gain energy independence....Once I get my financial aid I am going to step this up, gonna get a Neon sign transformer and make me some honkin coils...until then I will continue to do experiments with what I can scrounge up, and further my knowledge of the truth....I think it will save me a lot of money in the long run....well I am gonna get back to it...ttyl.

[RadiantEnRg]

Ahhh...it cut out my bible reference...It said ....w.h.o.r.e of Babylon...lol anyway I am getting back to my experimenting/building later guys.

[tinu]

@ Tinu...you must not know where to look.
My circuit like I said is not grounded..however, I understand that the field field is in the room with me...that's why i devised this test to prove to all it IS NOT PARASITIC C that is behind the one wire illumination. Come look at my Proof2 video...and you may be able to see the Radiant


Here's my proof that this in an influx of radiant energy!!!   http://www.youtube.com/v/oIidGfe0sPM

@RadiantEnRg,

I am not against your experiments. Far from my attitude. Like I said, I appreciate them a lot.

I?ve conducted similar experiments, several times in the near past.
There is one more parasitic C you have to have in mind all the time. This is C over length of any conductor (actually of any body). Avramenko plug is working because any wire has a distributed capacitance over its length.

It may be the case that in your last video, the C over the length of the plate is much higher than the C through the insulating foil, thus possibly explaining why the neon is brighter in one case. I don?t know for sure ? you have a particular setup, which is at your disposal. And I?m not arguing. I just want the subject to be properly discussed.

Also, it is not necessarily always the case when the circuit is primarily closed to the battery. For high voltages there are plenty of cases where you can close a circuit locally and see a current through it.
For experimenting with such cases, I suggest you take a common fluorescent tube and check the E field around it. You?ll see the E-field is very intense and it is decreasing with distance. By placing conductors, Avramenko plugs, neon test lamps, you can easily make a case when by using the existing E gradient, the test lamp will light being in complete electrical isolation. (you can suspend the whole setup using a non-conductive wire).

I?ll wait for more people to come and share their experience.
Again, please do not consider I am against you. I?d just like to nail down the ?radiant energy? if real, to describe it in common terms and to put it to work. All effects are real and they are very intriguing but so far I couldn?t pinpoint a specific experiment that can not be explained by conventional understanding.

Many thanks,
Tinu