SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[tinu]

No, I can't waste time to sort out your confusion. Like I said, you have to sort it out on your own.

Nice excuse.
Ok, then.  Let?s wait for other?s opinion on the above CoE-obeyed proof and remembering that a proof remains true until refuted. And let?s hope that one day in the future we might see a similar page ending with CoE>1, QED.

Tinu out

[Omnibus]

What remains true is that CoE is violated. As for your confusion, you have to deal with it not anybody else.

[wizkycho2]

Hi All !

Can someone recommend relativly cheap source of SmCo or NdFeB magnets
...ktmagnets (china) is not responding... although  I had good expirience regarding price, quality
and fast shipment.

I'm in need of block shaped magnets AxBxC=100x25x5 (all mm). 10 pieces
magnetised through C (thickness)
plastic (epoxy) or Zn or Ni coated. grade SmCo 24 or N27 to N40.

any recommendations

thanks

[gyulasun]

Hi All !

Can someone recommend relativly cheap source of SmCo or NdFeB magnets
...ktmagnets (china) is not responding... although  I had good expirience regarding price, quality
and fast shipment.

I'm in need of block shaped magnets AxBxC=100x25x5 (all mm). 10 pieces
magnetised through C (thickness)
plastic (epoxy) or Zn or Ni coated. grade SmCo 24 or N27 to N40.

any recommendations

thanks

Hi,

Here are two links, not sure they are cheaper than the Chinese (maybe the second one approach them):

from USA: http://www.amazingmagnets.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&Category=25595

from Germany: http://www.monstermagnete.de/catalog/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=Q150  (they focus on SMOT magnets too  and postage 5EU only!!!)

Last year I ordered some arc magnets from http://www.cndailymag.com/permanent-magnets.htm , managing director Charles Yao (his e-mail is charles@cndailymag.com ) I received good price offer from him. Try him!

rgds,  Gyula

[Low-Q]

What remains true is that CoE is violated. As for your confusion, you have to deal with it not anybody else.

Yes, the truth is that CoE, according to the math, is violated. However, the math posted this far is incomplete. The whole picture is not yet presented, and threfor CoE seems to be violated. Complete the math, and you'll soon understand this.

PS! NO, I'm not cluttering up this thread with nonsense.

Vidar