Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Inquorate]

   Inquorate:   Thanks for the video and presentation.   Can you provide any proof that the Docs circuits, such as the "secret" diode loop circuit, are able to produce OU, or self running?   We can say that any "extra energy" may be coming from the "ambient". But, what extra energy?  Can any of this supposed extra energy be shown, and proven, by input to output measurements? As I have not seen this to be the case, as yet. After several months work on these circuits.   If no extra energy can be shown, up to now. What is the point?

Here are a few documents to consider. However, I will say here that I tried for years to walk before I could crawl. Unless you have a signal generator with fast fourier transform spectrum analysis, AND a sine wave signal generator capable of 50mhz AT MINIMUM, you won't be able to tune properly.


Also, unless you understand what is happening with one coil, you won't understand what happens with two. And then you need to understand how 2 coild with a capacitor between them works.


Here are some videos to watch;


https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBnO2i7wr6vVxUSPGdtFthA-go6FiXAMr


and here are some articles which may help you understand all the effects that can be brought together in resonance;


http://www.i-sis.org.uk/The_Z_theory_of_everything.php
https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-discover-exotic-patterns-of-synchronization-20190404/
Universal Quantum Phenomenon Found in Superconductors | Quanta Magazine
LED's efficiency exceeds 100%
Faster-Than-Light Travel Could Explain Mysterious Signals Beaming Through the Cosmos | Live Science
Current mode second breakdown in epitaxial planar transistors - IEEE Journals & Magazine
Negative resistance in p-n junctions under avalanche breakdown conditions, part I - IEEE Journals & Magazine
https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-1/ac-phase/


So, There are all the answers.


I recently purchased everything required to make some calorimeters, and aim to replicate the single wire excitation document, starting with testing the calorimeters to determine how big their margin of error is.


Start at the beginning.

[Inquorate]

There's also these. But better to start with one or two coils and go from there

[NickZ]

   Inquorate:   Thanks for the links. However, I am very familiar with the Docs work, and ideas. I followed him, and replicated some of his last tests, but was not able to observe anything particularly useful. As far as input to output is concerned.
His diode bridge or loop "secret" was also replicated by me, but again, I found little actual useful benefit from the "diode loop" tests.As a higher output caused by the switching diodes used, also causes the input current to raise, as well. So, a very efficient circuit, but, no free lunch.
   The question: Is there any real third party proof by real measurements showing OU, or anything to get excited about?   I have followed the Doc to the end, and do have a signal generator, scope, etz... So, no need to start with one or two coils...   I have spent many hours, days, and months working on his circuits, know his theories, and circuits. Therefore, my question to you, are there any working Dr. Stiffer type of replications, that you know of? By that I mean self running, OU, etz...
  Here is one of my videos showing my version of Dr. Stiffler's "diode loop" tests and replications. I was using a crystal oscillator that I built, running at 12.MHz. I tested using the 13.6MHz crystals, as well, which was where the Docs best running frequency sweet spot, was at.
   https://youtu.be/MydqZEBi9TM

[Inquorate]

Picking a frequency such as 13.6 mhz (you did well to find a 13.6mhs xtal. I was unable to find any the times I looked.) without knowing why you are picking it, or 12mhz or ten, will get you nowhere. You will not see gain. I have done experiments using avramenko plugs in apurely transverse wave environment. Nothing special hapens. You have to have resonant atomic phonon (longitudinal) vibrations present.

Your system in the video, unless you have tuned the oscillator to the spatial resonant frequency of the coil, you are just making loads of electromagnetic waves. If you turn up the power, you might start to see interesting stuff by pure chance, as you may hit a resonant point somewhere in the circuit.
you do need to look at one or two coils. if you understood what was happening, you would have built the circuit differently, and paid more attention to how you made the coils. For example, please look at this and tell me what you see.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BuObUphgNXg/
Regards,Ben

[NickZ]

  Well, yes. My two or three coils are tuned to their best running frequency. Which for me was not 13.6MHz, but 12Mhz, instead. I do have and have tried using many different crystal frequencies. And my best response may be slightly different ambient frequency point, than where the Doc was located. But, it was close to the same sweet spot, in any case.    BTW: you can find 13.6MHz crystals (two) in old an wireless Pc mouse. Or order them online.
    What do I see in the images that you posted? Well,  I see that there are no input to output measurements... which is really what we need. Spacial coherence, and it's resonant frequency response, is what I am looking for. I know what I'm looking for.        Have you found what you're looking for?    It easy to say you need this or that to have results, but I don't see anyone showing real measurements, to prove the point. Further more, I don't think that it's even possible to show accurate scope shots. Since connecting a scope negative ground probe to the circuit will KILL the HV, to ground. So...
    I do think that there is something to all this, or I would not have spent the time studying and replicating his circuits.
But, now he's  gone.   We are still here...  So, can you show us something to get excited about? Not just theory. I understand the theory... But, you may not be up to speed on his final "secret" diode loop circuits tests, and how they are supposed to work, and why. As I did not see you participating in that project, which was different in several ways, to his earlier builds and tests.