Steven Mark`s TPU

[BEP]

@Wattsup

My favorite analogy is this - Two cars in a head-on collision. If they are transverse cars (moving like a Hertzian wave) when they collide one magically drives over the other car and no damage is done to either. The only thing that happens is their total height and energy, for that instant, is doubled. Once they pass they continue without any effects.
No two-sisters effect there  (Don't ever try to recreate the 3-Mother-in-Law effect )
This is the way of most wave crossings in water and EM or A²+B²

Now for the reality of a car crash:
The two cars are LEM (longitudinal) cars. They are both travelling at 50 kph. When they hit, the damage done is the same as if each separately hit a brick wall at 200 kph or (A+B)²
Two-Sisters effect 

Now add a third sister and stand back 

The energy in any wave is the square of the area of that wave.

For those spouting 'don't work in EM da same way as water'. Tell that to the folks using magnetrons and wave guides.

BTW: The resultant wave on EM's graphic won't look like a single pulse at the point of combination. It will be two pulses of extremely high amplitude and short duration. Each will be generated when the leading and trailing edges of the two waves cross its like neighbor. When the two are side-by-side and at highest amplitude the resultant amplitude will be the difference of the two. So the middle will fall to zero, in this case. When a trailing edge crosses a leading edge the result is zero. - good way to make unidirectional current flow or cause an electrostatic charge to build up on a conductor. Also a good way to make a wave fit onto a conductor shorter than a wavelength.

My view of DC (or PM) bias is it mainly just concentrates magnetic flux where work must be done. You could do the same with electrostatic bias and work from the other angle. I suspect electing to use E vs. H bias is why there appear to be two major types of TPU's.

[BEP]

I should say:

There is a lot of energy that should result from this type of activity but forcing a disconnection an allowing the reconnection (forcing from near-field to far-field and allowing it to fall back to near-field) should result in energy magnitudes higher.

http://www.emfs.info/source_distance.asp

[EMdevices]

I don't understand what you guys are talking about?  This is all Hungarian to me!    LOL   

Let's make a device based on this principle and see if it works.

EM

[duff]

Do magnetic fields really cancel???

Now that I actually stop and think about it I'm not so sure.

When you bring magnets close to each other have you ever seen field lines cancel.

In the attachment I've compiled frames from an old Floyd Sweets video where he displays the field lines surrounding magnets.


-Duff

[BEP]

If by 'cancel' you mean totally eliminate - no. The net magnetic field can be zero. That does not mean there is no magnetic field. Zero doesn't even mean non-existance. Zero is only nothing depending upon the observer's frame.

Zero, plus, minus, positive and negative are just ideas we created to help us understand something - not good ideas, in my book.

Zero on your scope may be thousands of volts if you change your reference.

Nice shots of 'field lines'. Chances are pretty good the actual lines are still on the screen even when there is no magnet nearby. I would have put them there to help show the field shape just like 'field lines' were intended originally - only a way to visualize the shape.

Notice how all the subtext seems wrong? I doubt it is. I also doubt it is the magnetic H field he is showing.