Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

ffonz

Found this today in one of my places I frequent on a regular basis..
and if this doesn't tell us what the universal benefits of free energy
are.. then I don't know what it takes to prove we all desperately need
the likes of what you are all working on with these free energy devices
and getting something workable in the hands of the people as soon as.

We're already decades too late for these coal ash problems.  This is a
very scary read to put it bluntly.. and who knows what else the EPA etc
are hiding from us all in every other industry out there like this one.

http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/1144/


All the best to you guys with finding the solutions to finally get these
devices working -- and the knowledge of it all finally figured out so you
can move on to even better versions and concepts and devices for the
people.  You are doing a great and a marvelous work here.


ffonz   8)

PS.. I continue to keep watch on your progress in the hope that I can
see a successful conclusion to your work in my lifetime (nearly over I'd
guess at this stage -- seeing I'm past my allotted 3 score years & 10).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[]

CRANKYpants

I DID A QUICK "RUN-DOWN" TEST TODAY WHERE I LET THE LOADED HC COIL DECELERATE THE SYSTEM DOWN TO STEADY STATE AND THE GRAPHED IT AGAINST THE HV COIL/LOADED HC COIL ACCELERATION.

WITH A SET MOTOR INPUT:

CONVENTIONAL MODE GENERATOR O/P = 0.003 WATTS @ 25 RPM
PEREPITEIA MODE GENERATOR O/P = 21 WATTS @ 3500 RPM

PERCENTAGE POWER GAIN = 700,000%

CHEERS
T

Nali2001

Hi ya'll.
Well here I go again speaking my mind.
Thane, I don't know how you "sell" your systems to tech interested investors and such, but stating that your system has a 700.000% gain over conventional power generating -aka 'lenz active' methods is a bit bold, to say the least. It is only that immensity effective compared to the way you have implemented the conventional way. To me is seems you conventional mode is rather inefficient, to say the least, and so not really a honest representative of the 'conventional way' This situation seems like having a worst case burned out car performing versus a good car.

Also the fact that your system in conventional mode decelerates noticeably from a 0.003watt load (I mean that's like 175th of a led power level...) should tell you that it is not really a good 'representative' of the conventional way.

Steven

hoptoad

Quote from: Nali2001 on February 23, 2009, 09:58:23 PM
Hi ya'll.
Well here I go again speaking my mind.
Thane, I don't know how you "sell" your systems to tech interested investors and such, but stating that your system has a 700.000% gain over conventional power generating -aka 'lenz active' methods is a bit bold, to say the least. It is only that immensity effective compared to the way you have implemented the conventional way. To me is seems you conventional mode is rather inefficient, to say the least, and so not really a honest representative of the 'conventional way' This situation seems like having a worst case burned out car performing versus a good car.

Also the fact that your system in conventional mode decelerates noticeably from a 0.003watt load (I mean that's like 175th of a led power level...) should tell you that it is not really a good 'representative' of the conventional way.

Steven

Agreed.

And once again,  no Motor INPUT Power measured against Generator OUTPUT Power to show total system transfer efficiency.

Cheers

Bessler007

QuoteThane Heins Perepiteia.  « 1 2 ... 425 426 »       RunningBare       4259      148156      Last post   Today at 03:27:44 AM
by hoptoad


I noticed I had some ideas about this thread when it first began.  I've forgotten what I thought then but I promise I'll review the beginning and comment.

I'd like to ask anyone if they could bring me up to speed without my having to look at 4260 posts that have been viewed 148,156 times.  Surely there's someone out there that has been following this willing to offer some cliff notes on this thread.  :)

This is perpetual insanity!!   Stop it!

At this point my thoughts are this:  If there is any merit in any idea, there has to be a practical demonstration of it.  I might change my mind about that if someone could help me understand what's going on here.

What the hell is going on??!?

Bessler007
Cmdr, MiB
:)
http://www.bessler007.blogspot.com
Please try again. If you come back to this error screen, report the error to an administrator.