The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[Tink]

Buzz-Ard,
I got this warning from Firefox;

Reported Attack Site!

This web site at www.randallsteward.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.
Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.

This site is currently (as of 05/22/2008) being reported to StopBadware by the following partners:

Google: reported bad

What is wrong?

[buzz-ard]

Dunno, but I'll sure find out. Thanks!

[giantkiller]

The sine wave circuit that Bolt showed me to produce for the heterodyning experiment was the key to the whole mystery. This has been working for a year and the results are still conclusive.

1: You push at the right frequency. A reciprocal pressure returns.
2: The dc with the ac hash is the DC polarized field with the ac being the resonant frequency pressure on top. You create tidal waves.
3: The rotational field can be seen in alot of places. Alot have shown the vortex aka the RMF. The water and wind based storms.
    I and IS created a rotation audio pressure by heterodyning. At the right mix it is created from the applied pressures.
    This was an environmental expample. Pretty simple.
4: I switched back to square waves to see the difference in the applied pressures.
5: With square waves applied, when the ring starts, or the ramping up, the high speed edges of the  pulse present a brick wall to the returning reflection. This is an abrupt force by multiplication. The scopes, the amp meters, the dogs all go flying. Ever do a belly flop? Was that usefull? What be a better way for a transistion?
6: The thump, thump, thump, is the ramp up and control just before over run.
7: Why sine waves? Smooth pressure to keep the energy at lower reactive levels compatible with copper, steel or iron conductors. The tidal wave against the wall just causes it to fly off. Pressure the force in complete balance with the reciprocal motion. Heterodyning.
8: The audio produced standing waves. The distance controllable by frequency? Yes and heterodyning too.

Ok so the previous explanations are mix of science, physics, electronics, magnetics and good old fashion 'What makes it tick?'.
I have all these aspects on my bench right now. I have all these aspects previously documented by 1 1/2 years here. I have posted all these aspects by words, explanations, and pictures. Many times over. These aspects were achieved by me doing what others have told me to do. And it all worked.
Am I trying to wreck the party? No. I am saying that the last step is to hook all this together. The last tests have gotten easier due to the fact that most of it all works at the minor levels. When I saw the ramp up, the meter go snapping into overload, the scope get blwon I saw what Otto, Ronotte, the ECD tests showed. The sine wave operation lets you see the kicks from the heterodyning with the whole system. And that can be seen to make useful. The square waves are already fast and noisy. How are you to catch that? Heterodyning with square waves looks like noise.
Heterodyning with 1 frequency. Yep. You can do it slopping in a tub of water. Same speed = same pressure. Speed equals voltage. When the water rises over the lip is where you see the kick. It's afterward, the end of the ramp up, the start of the runaway. IALMAO Now!
The circuitry can handle the ramp up far greater than the pansy ass digital scopes can. So you can only watch it so far. But the cheapy digital VOMs are a great visual fuse. LOL. 100ma, OV, 100ma, OV, 100ma, OV. and so on and so on.

I am hooking more up this weekend. Now don't get me wrong. It has taken alot of builds and that is most unfortunate in some cases. But now I can go to the next step. Seeing is believing. The mantra, so many times, was build, build, build.

Lets stop the old experimentation techniques. Think about playing with waves. Through the conductor (DC) and across the conductor (Sine). We are not using AC here. Everything goes the same way. Atleast that is what I have seen.

Now go get 5 iron nails. Wrap 30awg from rat shack around for 2 inches. Wrap 22awg around that for 1 inch. Build a blocking oscillator with variable frequency. Pulse the outside coil that is connected back through the inside coil either the same way or opposite. Put a scope on it. And check it out! Change the freq till it sings. You now have a starting platform and an incredible insight into cheap ways. Build 3 more and you have a 4 quadrant ring. Or coil wind the nails together end to end with paper insulators. Bend them around to wire the last ends together with paper in the middle. OR take a box of  coiled soft 1/4" copper tubing. Don't unwind it. Duct tape to a window. Connect one end to a stun gun. Leave the other end an inch from the other stun gun terminal. You can communicate with animals or airplanes overhead. All the technology is right under our noses.

--giantkiller. Itty, bitty, NT coils.

[pauldude000]

@ Paul - you are seeing the same square-to-sine conversion that I've seen several times now. At lower frequencies you can sometimes see the input square pulses riding on top of the sines, which demonstrates to me that there is indeed a conversion of some sort taking place, not just plain inductance and transformation. The sine wave frequency appeared to be a fraction of the square input frequency, like 1:20 or so (now I wish I had paid more attention). The first time I saw this is when I had started playing with feedback from the secondaries into the primaries, way back at what I call TPU1, and again in TPU4. http://www.randallsteward.com/TPU/ The super-imposed square would rise from the sine trace, stay on for 50%, then drop back down. If we assume the sine trace as zero-volts, there was no negative component shown in the square artifacts. Perhaps the negative square component is what was converted into the sine?

I have too in several of my air core winds, and I am now trying to amplify the effect. I tried feedback of the collectors into the controls, and DID get some small amplification, with the necessitation of a change in frequency, as it changed the fundamental operating frequency. However, something weird also happened. I started watching the whole sine "pulse" on the scope.. (like a heartbeat, and very slow about 1HZ or so) The frequency remained the same, but the amplitude of the sine was pulsing.

?

Paul Andrulis 

[pauldude000]

@Giantkiller

I see what you are saying, and I think there is merit to your words.

I also think the sine conversion is possibly a technique to stop the runaway effect. I have had ramp up with inherent low frequency pulses, yet not have had to worry about runaway yet. I have had MUCH more control over the output voltage, and now see that I can control the output voltage by the control of the input pulse voltage, which dampens the effect.

I also know that I am close to a hyperaccelerative ramp effect in input of collector voltage into the controls, where I will need a very strong (high amperage) sine source at a given voltage to control the effect, or it will accelerate itself no matter what I do except possibly tuning further off frequency. (This sucker will runaway)

I also think that close to this point, I will see a standing wave in the collectors. This will amount to a DC output, with miniscule ac harmonics controlling the voltage ramp. (Up close on the screen, imagine a DC line with superimposed harmonics using the DC line as the ground line.) I am still too low of frequency for this, but am about to build another one built on this principle to check the thought.

Truly, I think we have had every builder going in different directions around proverbial "jerry robinson's barn" to get to the same point. However, I truly do think the standing wave is the proverbial DC with hash, and is as dangerous as a rattlesnake.

Paul Andrulis