Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Wild & crazy Caduceus Coil interpretation

Started by Koen1, April 22, 2008, 10:28:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Koen1

:D lol well since we're half baking anyway I don't mind a
small entanglement of threads ;)

Your Stubblefield coil is very intriguing.
I am still not entirely certain of its configuration, but there may well be
something more going on there that I have not shown in the pics.
Those pics are mainly an aid for understanding how the coils and fields
in a caduceus setup would interact.
But your Stubblefield coil is still slightly different, I think.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the Stubble-coil is wound using the
two different metal wires, in this case iron and copper, right next to eachother,
and winding them like you would wind a 2-wire bifilar coil, but instead
of coiling them up to make a "normal" solenoid coil you coil them up into
a caduceus... right?
Well, in such a configuration it seems we have not just a caduceus,
but a bifilar caduceus.
Field interactions will be different for such a coil. I'll draw that out too,
when I have some time.

From what I understood of Stubblefields descriptions of his "battery",
the galvanic reaction between the two dissimilar metal wires is only used
to generate a basic 'startup' current, which was fed into the 'secondary'.
This secondary then pulsed a magnetic field inside of which the core
and 'primary' coils were located, and somehow by authentic Stubblefield
magic these coils then would begin to produce increasingly strong current
on the output leads.
If so, then we may wonder if the two different metals are necessary,
or if we might simply be able to start the thing up with a feed current
into the secondary and use only one wire aroudn the core...
And that would be much more like what I drew.
Another possibility is of course that this bifilar caduceus has some interesting
property, and that for this to work it does need two wires in a bifilar
caduceus coil, but the wires may not need to be different metals.
Just some thoguhts... ;)

jeanna

Quote from: Koen1 on May 01, 2008, 07:06:26 AM
entanglement of threads ;)

ahh I like it... the weaving of quantum threads. nice.

Quotenot just a caduceus,
but a bifilar caduceus.

yes, perhaps 2 snakes each having 2 fangs?

QuoteField interactions will be different for such a coil. I'll draw that out too,
when I have some time.

I look forward to seeing that.

In a way, I am looking at that question right now. I am making similar coils with dissimilar gauge wires to see  what the difference would be (and if there is a difference).

BTW  There is a difference. I will make the 3rd today which is more of a control, but the voltage and amperage was higher yesterday on the one with fatter IRON wire. ( sneek preview there. ;) )


QuoteThis secondary then pulsed a magnetic field inside of which the core
and 'primary' coils were located, and somehow by authentic Stubblefield
magic these coils then would begin to produce increasingly strong current
on the output leads.

This gives me another idea. - at least a way to test out that thought.- Maybe I could force feed, if you will, some voltage pulsed into one of my secondary's and see what goes on in the primary.

As I read the patent the output leads are the secondary leads so, this is the other way around. I will keep this in mind and check it out.

Thanks for this, Koen, I am getting important insights from your thoughts and input.

jeanna