TESLA pattend 390721 BUILDERS THRED

[innovation_station]

@gk i guess you were done your build longggg b4 i started duh! silly me im a hard learner lol


at all the rest that have finished long ago .....  laughf  at me  and with me cuz i laugh at my self once agin  lol




i wasent gonna say this but i decided to ...

there was a thunderstorm here today ...  i saw the biggest lightning strike i ever saw in my life today....  it is better than this yet .. i was not at the time at home but close by  and i saw the strike from where i was i could of swore it hit the house ....  but i was told a bright blue flash of lite flew across my table to the window in the liveing room at the time of the strike ....


just all to strange ..  and it makes me wonder

so this will conclude my research on the tpu 

for the record im still broke and i dont have a properly working tpu but i will work at it and im sure over time the device will teach me ....

peace ist   

[Paul-R]

It seems to me that 390721 is very much two inventions put together.
I wonder if it would be better to separate them, and study them
apart.
Paul.

[Paul-R]

Re: the above post - I've got this wrong. This is a motor with a toroidal
power supply unit as its stator, isn't it?

[pauldude000]

@All & special attn to Paul-R

Look at Tesla patent #381,970

http://www.keelynet.com/tesla/00381970.pdf

If you look at the "transformer" in 390,721 then compare it to the device of 381,970, you notice that they are one and the same device.

There is one difference between the two..... notice and compare in particular the connections of each. I find this as interesting, as I just noticed it myself. The manner of inter-coil connection differs between the two, yet for an almost identical application between the two patents. Peculiar.

Both are rotating field devices, Usable as "transformers" (both patents) or as a dynamo (patent 381,970) with rotating powered stator windings AND external rotating field. ("generator" picture top of patent, same device).


I call the device in 390,721 the "Tesla TPU" for a reason.

Many things can be deduced about this device. 

1. It is A.C. (as clearly stated in both patents)
2. It creates and utilizes a rotating magnetic field (both patents)
3. It is inherently a versatile operation device (as demonstrated by the use of said in "generator" example)
4. Power take off may be either high voltage/low current or high current/low voltage for either carbon arc lamps or regular lighting (see 381,970)
5. Drive element (primary) is ALWAYS the finer wire of many turns - low current winding (both patents), no matter no 4 above. (both patents)
6. The secondary is heavier gauge or "coarser" wire of few turns. (both patents), NOTE: this makes sense for high current low voltage, but not for high voltage low current use.
7. These units DO NOT WORK OFF OF NORMAL TRANSFORMER ACTION (See note 6 above, and read 381,970 carefully), they operate off of the rotating field.
8. The units are iron core (both patents)
9. Construction shape may vary (both patents)


Something to think about.

Paul Andrulis

[Grumpy]

The Tesla device referenced is just a rotating magnetic field transformer.  Clever, but no magic.