Faraday's Paradox experiment

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Ok guys.  So here's another consideration. 

Assume that Faraday's lines of force - orbit - in some sort of synchronous arrangement.  And assume that they orbit with a shared justification - clockwise or anticlockwise.  Then the sum of the fields would comprise lines of force that have length, breadth and depth.  Then cut through the field like slicing Airstriker's 'apple' in half - either along the 'poles' of the apple or through its equator.  Either way the length of the lines of force on the outside boundary of that apple would be of greater length than those on the inside.  Also.  One half of each orbit would be shielded from the other half of each orbit because one half of each orbit would moving through the material body of the apple.  The other half would be moving through the space around the apple.

Now.  Presume that each line of force comprises little spherical magnets.  They've lined up.  Head to toe.  So.  There is perfect magnetic alignment along the strings.  There's imperfect alignment between one string and another.  The imperfections are the result of variable string lengths which prevent a sympathetic polar alignment.  Each string - each line of force - attracts one magnet to another.  Each neighbouring string repels other strings.  Therefore does the field NEVER reach a rest state.  They would orbit continuously - in an attempt to reach a rest state which would be forever prevented because of the innate repulsion/attraction extant within the field itself.

Now.  To add to the complexities.  Each orbit of each string - through 360 degrees would represent a justification.  One half of that direction is opposite to the other half - which is GB's 'relative perspective'.  In effect - not only is the entire field orbiting - but each half of each orbit diametrically opposes each half of each other orbit.  They would share the SAME direction, clockwise or otherwise, but one half of the entire string would be going in precisely the opposite direction to the other half of that string.  One half of the entire field would be moving opposite to the other half.  If the one half was travelling 'up' the other half would be travelling 'down'.  If one half was charged 'north' the other half would be charged 'south'.  This because charge is determined NOT by the innate properties of any particle - but by the direction it moves within a magnetic field.

Therefore.  Each part of each field would have a 'charge' property.  But the entire field would be neutral.  So.  Back to GB's point.  If I were positioned inside the apple I would experience a single justification or charge.  But iI I were outside the field I'd also experience a single justification - but opposite to the inside justification.

So.  If the basic postulate is right.  If the lines of force comprise little dipoles that are lined up head to toe - then I would conclude that a toroidal magnetic field is balanced - yet there is a charged property to each part of each string/field - yet the entire field is neutral.  It is how matter is positioned to the field that determines what 'charge' it feels - relative to matter's own charge.  So.  As spatial position is the 'thing' that determines the justification or 'bias' of a field, then when it comes to a magnetic field - it's simply a matter of perspective - like GB says. 

In any event that's how I see it.

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

PS
Now.  Let's assume that Airstriker's apple is floating around in bits and pieces - and each bit has a predominant 'up' 'south' or 'off' justification or bias or charge.  The bits come into the general area of that free floating disassocated field of magnetic dipoles - little spherical magnets.  Then.  Those little pieces would move towards the 'down' of the entire field.  That 'down' or 'north' charge of the field would incline all those little apple bits to move to the centre of that field.  And then they'd settle there.  Something like that.

But.  All that depends on whether those lines of force actually comprise a material body - in the first instance.  But if they did - then it would explain an awful lot.

[lumen]

Well, if we are to believe that the field actually rotates with a magnet rotating on it's axis, then we must consider the following condition.

In the rendering, there are two magnets rotating in opposite directions. As you can see, as the conductor cuts the field lines twice, they would however be rotating in opposite directions. This would induce a continuous DC flow through the conductor. Not only that, but the conductor could be looped many times increasing the voltage to a usable level and there would be no reaction between magnets or the conductor.

This would surly indicate that the field does not actually rotate with the magnet, but is instead free to always take the path of least work.

[Hypercom]

Hi

According to this principle, it is possible to build a Homopolar AC Generator? Magnets and disk are coupled together and run ...

[Hypercom]

Hi

Does anyone have news, information, 'AC homopolar generator made by Peter Lindemann and Michael Knox?