Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


A machine to convert gravity to mechanical energy # 2

Started by brian334, October 04, 2008, 01:08:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

truth

 :P

@ jandell254,

Sir, your calculations appear to be made based on some other machine that falls in an AIR CHAMBER.

Perhaps actually reading some of the problems that have been repeatedly explained would assist you in understanding the multiplicity of reasons this design has been proved not to work. We ALL are here to find a way to do the impossible, but miscalculations, deceit, and stubbornness are obstacles not solutions.

@ Brian,

Do you really think that elementary school yard name calling makes you right or even appear to be an adult?

@ everyone,

The math we all face is this equation:
Energy output equals Energy input minus friction loss.

In most cases (allowing maximum efficiency) that is 1 minus greater than 1 resulting in a net loss.
1 = 1 - (>0)

I apologize for restating the obvious!


TinselKoala

"Also at the top the tank flips putting the 63 lb weight back on top."

From where comes the mysterious force that lifts the 63 pound weight, in the stopped tank, back up the 11 inches (or whatever) inside the tank?

All tanks must be stopped in order for the top and bottom tanks to flop over, expand or compress.

The rising tanks must be hooked to a belt, even if the descending ones aren't. Hence we are back to the problem that Mondrasek has been trying to get across. Either the tanks cannot maintain the same spacing (hence can't be attached to a belt), or the tanks cannot accelerate but must move at a constant speed.

So, it wouldn't work even if there was the momentum of the weight to use, and the momentum isn't there to begin with, because the whole assembly will have to move in little jerks, because it has to stop to allow tanks to flip/expand/contract.

Plus there must be an input of energy for each tank, at the top, to raise up the weight inside the tank.

brian334

The acceleration of the top tank is restricted by the generator allowing the tanks beneath it to catch up.