Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

[forest]

The point is that with DC system there is no reactive power.
The same could be done with AC but it's tricky due to resonance being disturbed so you have to have at least two separated resonant circuits and break at the peak of wave (that's why 1/4 wavelength)
Anyway I maybe wrong and crazy nut don't listen to me listen to Teeto-Master-Can-Obeey

[forest]

 "May the Force be with you" 

[ramset]

Forest
Master Tito is the only guy here running a refrigerator off a watch battery!

Would love to see that!!

Chet

[baroutologos]

You will agree with me that reactive power is bigger than active?
Than why should not be that reactive energy is bigger than active? Time is running. Energy is power * time !

Till to be proven, all are speculations. The point is if there is FE available, resonance of high VAR is our best bet. Also specially geometry, special receivers etc (biffilars ??) are supposed to tap that energy withou diminishing resonance.

[Qwert]

Hi to all.
I "feel", you all guys need to look at this site:
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
I don't want take part in this discussion since my knowledge ends just on popular science. I include an excerpt from this particular page, which may catch your attention:
"CONCLUSION
To sum up: we see that by putting a big AC voltage on the tuned circuit and by adjusting its phase in relation to the tiny incoming current, we can "suck" the E x M wattage from the enormously broad wavefronts of the incoming waves. It also works this way inside a simple circuit using conventional voltage dividers: add a resonant circuit, and the series impedance of the power source behaves smaller. See this example circuit. It should still work this way even when a part of the antenna circuit contains a series capacitor whose dielectric is made up of many feet (or even tens of km) of empty space. "