Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[ramset]

Buzz
This is your theory, the onus is on you [you seem quite prepared]

From what I have seen [before seeing your theory]
people were trying to explain it but not putting the right words/thoughts together

You have given a sense were there was none
and your theory of cavitation fits

It fits in nature and that is the most important fit

[sparks]

     I was reading somewhere that the liquid properties of a plasma allow magnetic hydrodynamics to go to work.  Now considering we are dragging this electrical current through the weak magnetic field of the Earth perhaps there is gain in the mhd current of the plasma from this motion.  The sudden collapse of these mhd currents  (magnetic monopole radiation of sorts) causes the field lines to reconnect releasing the stored kinetic energy of the plasma transport itself.  If there is a fraction of a joule gain and this is repeated at highfrequency then our resonant storage tank starts to fill up.

[Grumpy]

What is a highly disruptive dielectric current? - It's literally the BS that is goin' on in this thread  LOL
OK, now the real thing. I don't know if the term "highly disruptive dielectric current" would be exact. I see it similar as sparks mentioned, but i would say that this is just the green thing that Tesla observed (radiant spark). If you ask me, it's all about high voltage and minimal (or no) current. If anyone has a better explanation, i'm all ears.

I have produced and posted arcs of various colors - red (only across PVC), orange, green, blue, and white.   Initially, I thought the color was material related.  Ruling this out, I suspected that it was frequency related and this still stands as probable.  During the course of these experiments, I started thinking that Bedini was full of it. 

Since then I have noticed unusually powerful discharges from extremely small caps ("small" based on capacitance) that have large surface area (3 feet of coax for example) - there is no way that a cap this small can produce the discharges I have seen - no way - they are like a crack of lightning.  In all of these experiments the caps were impulse charged - a single sudden pulse.

I now believe that Bedini is actually correct - capacitors can hold more than we have been taught they can - I just can't prove it yet.

[ramset]

Sparks
That sounds good REAL GOOD!
gotta go to work
Later
Chet

[Grumpy]

Nature is what lead me to it Ramset. I know that nature is simple and repeats itself from the smallest to the largest. So I spread out every free energy patent I had collected over decades on the floor and started walking around looking for a pattern. Cavitation is the pattern I found.

Nature only knows one method to convert energy into mass and to convert mass back into energy from what I can determine.

I don't know every detail of every free energy device but once the basic principle is known, people can find the different methods used to accomplish it.

Placing three coils or inductors in series is one method. The phase change makes the third coil no longer able to see the first. The inductors do not collapse at the same time and so an electromagnetic cavitation takes place. Thane Heins toroid is using this method, Hubbard, Cook, probably the magnifier, etc.

Pulse a gas under a vacuum with high voltage and electrons are removed from the gas when it transmutes is another method used in many devices such as the Methernitha, Papp engine, probably Meyer, etc. I feel this one could be dangerous - don't play with it unless you are well trained.

Cavitate a fluid and some of the fluid is converted into atomic energy contained in the fluid such as the Clem engine and others.

What all the devices have in common is they produce acceleration which is a result of cavitation.

This is what all free energy device have in common and is what I have been saying for a year now on several different web sites. At first I hinted at the connection and I was ignored. I wanted someone else to figure it out and release the information. Later I started spelling it out in black and white and I was attacked for it. That is confirmation from the spook community that occupy and run many of these sites.

What never happened in all that time, with hundreds of posts, is not one person ever pointed at a validated free energy device that proved my theory wrong.

Many books have been written on the subject and not one of those books ever showed anybody how to invent a free energy device and the real principle that makes them work. If they did, free energy devices would be everywhere.

I didn't need to invent a device to prove the theory, plenty of people already did. What the inventors didn't do is either understand or explain how the device worked so they could be easily replicated.

The moment you invent a device and publicly prove it, you are going to get placed under an illegal secrecy order to protect the oil companies and Jewish central bankers that control the money rackets across the earth. You lose the device and the rights to it.

You must find a qualified patent attorney and still the corrupt government is not going to allow you to sell it.

I feel the best way is to produce a set on instructions so detailed and complete that anyone can follow it. Then thousands of people will be able to overwhelm the corporate ignorance and mind control embedded in academic science to prevent people from freeing themselves from that tyranny and destroying their careers if they do.

It all begins with a thought, everything does. This is the reason thought integrity is so important. Good examples of the insanity that results from a lack of thought integrity such as projection are all around you. Stick to the truth of the science and ignore the crazies and you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.

On the Magnifier - correct - the third coil does not see the first coil and the second one just drives the third.  It does not involve LC resonance like everyone thinks it does, but let them think that.

Researchers in cavitation, and there are not many, have witnessed sonoluminescence and electrical discharges.   

The underlying process for cavitation is "polarization" - a troll let that word slip too - funny that by screwing up they have given more credibility to your theory  - LOL!!!.  The "molecule is deformed and polarized with all of it's kinetic energy being transformed into polarization energy".  Google this quoted text - it will bring up "Cavitation By F. Ronald Young" and this text is on page 345.