"Free energy" and "Overunity" We need a definition.

[Aman Shah]

bullshit! a bunch of bessler links do NOTHING to forward an agreeable definition of the word 'overunity'.

we get it that you are obsessed with bessler, we have seen you spamming those very same links wherever you can on this forum... 

you are not on topic unless you are helping present an agreeable definition. and posting links to your favorite obsession does NOTHING to forward a definition. you do know what a dictionary is do you not? then you should understand what a definition is... 

Hello it's not spamming,its self realisation towards real freeeergy Technology.I haven't uncovered the exact concept due to patent reasions,but have fully explained with proofs the analogy of my engine concepts.It took me years of work,many sleepless nights to achieve something workable.

Please don't insult such a selfish less effort and devotion towards spreading the truth to public.

What I am doing is spreading the awareness about real free energy and I am trying to take out all the non-sense thinking from the society about free energy.

Also my experience has proved that free energy suppression is a real thing.

"Free energy is energy available in Nature,which does not cost a single peny except for the device investment."

If you have Commonsense you will tell that nothing can move by itself unless external force is applied.
The society needs to be filtered out from nonsense thoughts like overunity or perpetual Motioin machines.

"Overunity means additional output in a quantity without any equivalent input energy in a conservation equation which leaves the equation unbalanced."A overunity enegine cannot exist in real world.

Please read the technical parts of my blog articles like gravity powered trains,interloped path system in which net gravitational energy is varied continuously as well as my analogy concept.
I support free energy realisation,but in a workable manner.

[WilbyInebriated]

Hello it's not spamming,its self realisation towards real freeeergy Technology.I haven't uncovered the exact concept due to patent reasions,but have fully explained with proofs the analogy of my engine concepts.It took me years of work,many sleepless nights to achieve something workable.

Please don't insult such a selfish less effort and devotion towards spreading the truth to public.

What I am doing is spreading the awareness about real free energy and I am trying to take out all the non-sense thinking from the society about free energy.

Also my experience has proved that free energy suppression is a real thing.

"Free energy is energy available in Nature,which does not cost a single peny except for the device investment."

If you have Commonsense you will tell that nothing can move by itself unless external force is applied.
The society needs to be filtered out from nonsense thoughts like overunity or perpetual Motioin machines.

Please read the technical parts of my blog articles like gravity powered trains,interloped path system in which net gravitational energy is varied continuously as well as my analogy concept.
I support free energy realisation,but in a workable manner.

blah, blah, blah... do you think i was born yesterday?

do you have an actual, physically working bessler wheel?  yes? or no?

[Aman Shah]

Well,what I am doing is not a necessary a bessler wheel.Its simply a gravity powered engine.In my home succesful experiments have been done to verify the concepts.Actually such a verification was not needed since the concept follows well known and continuously used laws of physics.

Why no technical question to my technical articles on my blogs?

[WilbyInebriated]

Well,what I am doing is not a necessary a bessler wheel.Its simply a gravity powered engine.In my home succesful experiments have been done to verify the concepts.Actually such a verification was not needed since the concept follows well known and continuously used laws of physics.

Why no technical question to my technical articles on my blogs?

so that's a no then on any actual, physical working device. 

thank you.

[Aman Shah]

You can't be serious about the concept shown in http://www.flickr.com/photos/59145126@N07/7850519666/

The amount of energy that could be recovered on the downward run will always be less than amount of energy required to raise the train to the starting position.  As a gravity powered train it would work fine as long as it continues to travel downhill...

I challenge you to produce a coherent explanation otherwise, (or failing that show verifiable experimental evidence that is is so)

Such a system would be in violation of the first laws of thermodynamics and I'm amazed that someone who pupports to be an engineering student could say otherwise.

The amount of energy needed to travel 100 metres downward is more than amount of energy needed to travel 25 or 30 metres upward.
Dont you have a simple observation that the upward distance used here is less than downward distance purposefully.

Your explanation is correct only when amount of distance covered upward = amount of distance covered downward.
The only need is minimising losses and also the downward distance should be atleast 6 times more than upward distance.

Simple logic is Work done = force * displacement.

It's obvious that when commutator supplies energy upwards,displacement is very much lesser than when commutator reverses direction.

Offcoarse,the concept needs a ball type train compartment so that the forces act at a proper centre of mass.One problem I noticed here is this system is only suitable for one compartment.

The reasion why you need 6 times more displacement downwards is because its obvious that you have to regain energy supplied against both the components of gravity as well as account for large losses encurred as well as convert more gravitational energy into usable form of electrical energy.

The actual construction is more complex than simply varrying displacement slope paths.

My real concept is about the Analogy(Analogy is done generally to explain a similar phenomeneon by different example,so that full secret is still maintained untill patent is granted).
The gravity powered train is just a case study suggestion.

I also suggest that let the slopes be curvy.The curvy slopes will allow for more larger displacements in less space with more overall efficiency.

Just make a note that the compartment travels through Varrying potential energy gradients.
Potential energy will remain constant only between two points along a straight height.So many different heights produce a gradient along so long displacement.