The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[hartiberlin]

Hi Dave, do you get with your nice 4 coils on the toroid setup
now also this  rotating magnet field ?

http://overunity.com/stevenmark/toroid_gen.gif

Did you put each pair of the 2 coils in repelling mode, so the flux
comes out of the core ?

Then you could probably lower the frequency to a few Hz only and
see a compass rotate inside the center of the toroid ?

Does this work ?
How is the lightbulb connected ?

[hartiberlin]

@Dave
what DC source did you use with the ignition coil ? 12 Volts ?
How big were the forward kicks and how long did they last ? thanks .

Hi Stefan, the source was a simple, 12v/4aH deep cycle battery, charged at about 11.95v.

The kicks seem to last only 10uS or less.

I measure the signal across the coil, not the battery.  This can be seen in the circuit diagram I posted.

I have the software I think you are talking about, it shows how cancelling waves generate scalar waves?  If this is the one you mean, I will post it on my site for download or something.

Torroidal coils can be used to deflect gravity, as only the Motional E Field exist outside the torroid.  Electrons orbitting in neutral un magnetised matter generate magnetic field, BxV, but as they all move in different direction the magnetic field sums to zero, yet the motional E fields ADD.  This field is divergent and pulls on electrons in surrounding matter and pushes away the protons.  Gravity is soo weak beacuse we only feel the difference between the push and the pull and this also explain why neutral matter also has gravitational field.  You can see the work of Hooper, or check it out here http://www.electrogravityphysics.com/html/contents.html

You may know the motional E field as the Vector A potential?  It falls off with the square distance and is unsheildable, it matches gravity in every way and fills in the missing link!

Anyway, enough of my ramblings.


Regards,


Dave.

Hi Dave,
yes,please post it and does anyone know, how to slow the speed of these
old DOS programs, so one can really see, what is going on ?
Anything faster than a 100 Mhz Pentium 1 was too fast to see the output the programs..

Dave , are you sure, that the magnetic vectorfield A is the same as the Hooper Motional E-field ?

I really have to study his work.
Many thanks.

[hartiberlin]

Jason!

I have tried to perform a simlar test as you.  I have tested a torroid with another coil rapped around it at 90 degrees.  Then I have tested sine and square waves.  I am surprised to find that square waves can induce a perfect sinewave in the second coil, but a sine wave on the input just makes a small mess on the output.  Also I have only few turns on the output, yet I can measure better voltage than the input.

I have tested the output by loading with 1ohm/5watt non-inductive resistor, the results can be seen below.  By the way, I forgot to test with input ground floating, will try that later!

For better tests I will need to build a square wave pulse circuit at the resonant frequency (determinded by scope sweep), then I can run off a battery and measure DC power used on the INPUT to I can compare easier.

Please note the input signal is in RED, the output in BLUE.

(note- first pic should say unloaded, not inloaded)


Regards,


Dave.

Hi Dave,
well done tests.
Please also try with a higher load resistor like 10 Ohm or 100 Ohm or 1 KOhm.

What is about the turn numbers of your coils ?
Only copper coils or also iron coils ?

I see the drivercoil from your photo
Photo_092006_005.jpg
is only a few windings and is only going around a short distance
around the main coil and only at the outer side it is near the output coil,
as on the other side you have this tape layers  still there, so the distance is greater.

As TAO posted from the Steven Mark comment, that it works like a garden hose
if you squeeze it , the water will come out....
so only squeezing it at one small location will not make much water come
out of the hose, but if you squeeze the whole toroid hose at the same time,
if will come ALL of the water out in one big rush !

Now the question is, how we can lower the input power to do the squeezing
and get more "water" out, then we needed to power the squeezing !

[hartiberlin]

Jason!

I have tried to perform a simlar test as you.  I have tested a torroid with another coil rapped around it at 90 degrees.  Then I have tested sine and square waves.  I am surprised to find that square waves can induce a perfect sinewave in the second coil, but a sine wave on the input just makes a small mess on the output.  Also I have only few turns on the output, yet I can measure better voltage than the input.

Hi Dave,
does the square wave input have to be at the resonance frequency of the output coil
to get such a good sine wave at the output ?

What, if you just use short pulses, so if you use only 10:90 on-off pulse width ?

Could you reduce this way the input power and still have the same output power ?

Will this also work at other frequencies or only at the resonance frequency
of the output coil ?

[PaulLowrance]

Hi Stefan,

If no Barkhausen effect resonance is used to extract the power from iron coils, then I guess it must be some kind of Lentz law violation, if only copper coils are used.

I'm curious, where would this information come from? You've mentioned this Barkhausen effect resonance on numerous occasions, but it was my impression this has not been verified yet.  I believe tao and others have repeatedly tried to find this 180 KHz resonance and even below this frequency and way up in the MHz range without finding it. Is there an experiment that tao or anyone can try that reveals this 180 KHz Barkhausen effect resonance?  Or are you simply refereeing to a theory or unproven claims?

According to my research there is no fixed resonance near 180 KHz in magnetic material. There is something called FMR (FerroMagnetic Resoance), but it's not a fixed frequency and is way up their in frequency. Also there's ESR (Electron Spin Resonance), and EPR (Electron Paramagnetic Resonance), and last but not least NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance), but all these are not fixed resonance's and far from 180 KHz.

To my knowledge the field caused by Barkhausen effect is mostly random noise and somewhat broad spectrum. It's commonly known this effect is cause by avalanche effect and very pronounced in hard steel due to pinning and the free electrons in steel or iron dampen the avalanche thereby lowering the frequency spectrum.

Yes I would agree and debate any physicist there's "free energy" to be gained from the avalanche (the cause of Magnetocaloric energy), but so far nobody has proven this by closing the loop and publishing the exact build instructions for such a device. Yes, I firmly believe someone will one day close the loop on such a Magnetocaloric energy machine, but from what I know it is very tricky, but possible.

Regards,
Paul Lowrance