Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[Omnibus]

Internal combustion engines work not because someone has made them to show you they work. They would work even if you haven't seen them work because the principles they are based on work. Same applies to perpetuum mobile. The fact that someone called Dsimanek cannot make a perpetuum mobile work doesn't at all mean that a working perpetuum mobile cannot be made because the principle for a working perpetuum mobile to be made works. No one has ever seen a Tokamak work but billions are still been poured in to make a working Tokamak because the principle it's based on works.

[WilbyInebriated]

The logic behind "these devices are not working doesn't make them unworking" is clear unless someone wants to twist logic. The museum is not set up to demonstrate a bunch of crap that doesn't work but to prove that the principle these devices are based on is unworkable. If general principles can be disproved by placing a bunch of unworkable crap in a compilation called museum then it's easy to disprove any workable principle -- just show how incapable you are and that'll do.

LOL
the general principles these devices are based upon is what makes them unworkable. not the fact that someone has made a collection out of them...

[Omnibus]

Someone called dsimanek has only proved how incapable he is to make a workable device. That's the only thing he has proven with the collection he has made. There is no proof provided by the individual dsimanek that the general principle these devices are based on is unworkable. And, how can he proce that since just the opposite can be proved, namely that the general principle these devices are based on is workable.

[MrMag]

Someone called dsimanek has only proved how incapable he is to make a workable device. That's the only thing he has proven with the collection he has made. There is no proof provided by the individual dsimanek that the general principle these devices are based on is unworkable. And, how can he proce that since just the opposite can be proved, namely that the general principle these devices are based on is workable.

I think you are now starting to confuse yourself. The general principle these devices are based on is workable? Maybe they look like they can work. You may even be able to prove it scientifically, if you use the formulas you like, but in real life, they don't work.

Tell you what. You build a working model of one of the devices that he has on his site and I will start a petition for him to remove it from his site. I am sure you are more then capable of building one of these devices.

Wilby, not sure if even the double will suffice.

[spinn_MP]

Someone called dsimanek has only proved how incapable he is to make a workable device. That's the only thing he has proven with the collection he has made. There is no proof provided by the individual dsimanek that the general principle these devices are based on is unworkable. And, how can he proce that since just the opposite can be proved, namely that the general principle these devices are based on is workable.

Your anger towards "dismanek" just proves that you don't have a clue about what you're preaching here day in day out...