Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[AquariuZ]

So, we are in a bad shape. On the one hand we have a whole department (center): http://www.rug.nl/natuurkunde/onderzoek/instituten/ctn/organisatie/index full of bright people who with full certainty are wasting their time 100% while the society perceives them as reliable scientists. On the other hand we have the likes of Sjack Abeling, more of a gold-digger than anything else (why otherwise the games he is playing), who may be onto something while hiding in his barn. The former is institutionalized provable nonsense, the latter a betting game. We are really in a bad shape.

If you really want to get involved why not pay Sjack a visit instead of the professor.

He is not "hiding" in his barn. His data is publically available. I even spoke to him over the phone. I would visit him myself but I am 1600 miles away from Ter Apel.

[AquariuZ]

NO COMMENTS ON MY THEORY?

Is it that bad?

Racking my brain reading the clues over the past few days this is my initial try... The weights are connected via bars like the things used in weightlifting (Dutch: "Halter"). The wheel consists of two layers with slots. The halters effectively connect the two wheel layers... To get the "D" type action, some form of static barrier must be placed between the two wheel layers, which will stop the bars connecting the weights from going past the six o clock position, effectively pushing the welter in an upward motion, shot putting the halter (two weights connected with a steel bar) from the six o clock position into the twelve o clock position on the other side. Pow. The halter lands between twelve and one o clock and falls into place where gravity takes a hold.

There are 16 slots on each wheel, each "Tube" has two slots, one halter per tube so a total of 8 halters for the system.

Here a quick wm2d model I made, yes, it is full of errors but hopefully you will see what I am trying to say. This is the view from one side, you should see the spheres as only one part of the halter. I have made only 8 slots, as the full 16 would be too intensive for now. Funny thing is that the slots look somewhat like boots (as in the video).

Model download http://www.gigasize.com/get.php?d=yz59m4y7wqd

It is 1.34Mb zipped.

Needless to say the barrier stops the weights in this model whereas in the real model the bar connecting the weights would be stopped. For motion display purposes I use a motor at -0.20 rad I would not dare to presume to create an entire working model of the actual system because this is simply not possible with this software.

Hopefully I will be able to make a more complete view soon. Looking forward to suggestions.

Edit: this is what I mean with halter, it is a dumbbell weight

Second picture: The dumbbell path viewed from the side with the white circle being the axle of the wheel, the right side being the fixed acceleration path and the left side being the lifting or dumbbell shot-put path.

[Philip Hardcastle]

@Aquariuz

I do not normally post strong views about ideas as I do not wish to upset anyone... but a device generating power from weights, in whatever arrangement, is rubbish. I only say this so that those people listening to those people pushing such ideas and talking investors know to be wary (run in fact).

Phyics is physics, sometimes slightly wrong, sometimes yet to be discovered but wheels and weights hold no possible surprises.

Regards

Phil

[AquariuZ]

but a device generating power from weights, in whatever arrangement, is rubbish. I only say this so that those people listening to those people pushing such ideas and talking investors know to be wary (run in fact).

Everything that can be invented has been invented.
    Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. patent office, 1899 (attributed)

Without further comment.

[spinner]

Everything that can be invented has been invented.
    Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. patent office, 1899 (attributed)

Without further comment.

Lol, why no comment? I'd like to hear your thoughts about that...

Yes, this was one of those "historical" statements which is still widely used by the "FE" proponents as a "proof how science is blind".... I suggest you explore the background of this famous statement, it certainly is interesting...

Surely, you don't believe that some clerk opinion could represent a general scientific opinion of that time? Why did you pick the minority opinion? Because it suits you at the moment?

Shall we start with the flat Earth, Heliocentric stuff,..  Alchemy, Phlogiston..
Continuing with Tesla, Edison,... Wright brothers, flight,... tectonic plates,.. .. rockets,.. the bumblebee story, genetics,..etc...? Pick one...

People always make mistakes. Me, You, ... and everyone else...

Just reread this thread of yours, and list all the false statements made by anyone participating so far....

The results?
Cheers!