Gravity Wheel Power Cycle - A working Wheel Is Possible?

[AquariuZ]

Well I *was* trying to be facetious!  Humor might draw more minds into the discussion. 

Obviously humor is not appreciated on this forum. Maybe that is why never anything substantial emerges?

Pity. Especially for the individuals who are really trying (like yourself).

AZ

[Philip Hardcastle]

A working wheel is not possible and logic should prove that.

Putting aside the physics and just dealing with reality...

If it were possible it would have been done by now, after all it only involves wheels, weights, arms, pulleys etc.

Human ingenuity would have worked something out by now.

But hey there is a whole bunch of people on the other thread denying reason and working furiously to do what no one has done.

I admire them that they can keep going for weeks on a dead horse idea.

I just feel it is a pity that the debate cannot rise to a more productive level.

Proper theories or postulates being made leading to strong debate and to possible new ideas.

P

[mondrasek]

I just feel it is a pity that the debate cannot rise to a more productive level.

Proper theories or postulates being made leading to strong debate and to possible new ideas.

And just what do you think *this* thread is about?  We have an analysis of the gravity wheel power cycle that appears to show it is possible.  That is what this thread is about.  Can you argue this mathematical analysis?

[AquariuZ]

I just feel it is a pity that the debate cannot rise to a more productive level.

Proper theories or postulates being made leading to strong debate and to possible new ideas.

P

Then start by re-examining all you were taught and assuming Newton et al were wrong.

Take it from there and bring something completely new for a change..

Please.

[Philip Hardcastle]

I thought this thread was an open minded question. It seems that Mondrasek is a believer that wants an argument. Everyone here takes an attitude that everything is possible and that physics is so wrong. Why not take a view that physics is probably right and that we search for ideas that go with the flow rather than against.

There is no analysis that gravity wheels will work that even looks like a scientific or logical argument.

Aquariuz suggests I am the problem for believing in Newton et al, well it seems that agreeing with established science is a better starting point than trowing it all out and believing in rumours such as some here seem to follow.

We all see that there are thousands of claims for overunity but none pan out, then we get conspiracy theories about MIB etc. All I can say is that on the site I have put forward 2 technologies (curled ballistic and rotating thermionic generator) that have no found flaw but I have never received a threat.

I am offering a cash prize on curled ballistic thermionics for someone to find a flaw (no takers). I have debated with a dozen professors. Now you guys that believe in magic ignore my ideas but then say I should come here with new ideas! I think I have proved my preparedness to challenge conventional thinking but do not ask me to believe in superstition, conspiracy or rumour.

Phil