Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Explosives Used on 911 - Here's All the Evidence Needed

Started by Cap-Z-ro, April 12, 2009, 08:59:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cap-Z-ro


Disinfo agents (likely paid in this instance) aim to keep you in an endless a cyce of dragging you back to issues that have already been resolved...ignore them.

I wish Stefan would give thread starters moderator status on their threads...then disinfo or malicious posts could be eliminated, and serve only to bump up the threads the disruptive posters wanted to derail.

If you really want to get under their skin they hate being outed as agents of disinformation by the way.

Regards...


utilitarian

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on April 14, 2009, 07:09:32 AM
Disinfo agents (likely paid in this instance) aim to keep you in an endless a cyce of dragging you back to issues that have already been resolved...ignore them.

I wish Stefan would give thread starters moderator status on their threads...then disinfo or malicious posts could be eliminated, and serve only to bump up the threads the disruptive posters wanted to derail.

If you really want to get under their skin they hate being outed as agents of disinformation by the way.

Regards...



Ah, very funny.  You accuse the government of suppression, and then ask for power to suppress dissenting views.  Sounds like the Bolsheviks replacing the Czar.

utilitarian

Quote from: jibbguy on April 14, 2009, 06:52:29 AM
Why Bldg 7 was dropped ("pulled"): Mainly money. If part of the complex had still stood mainly undamaged (and Bldg. 7 was mainly undamaged), Silverstein and his partners could not have gotten all of his 6 Billion in double-indemnity insurance payment... Not bad, for a 250 million investment. He was only the Lease Holder. He didn't build it, was only renting it from the city and sub-leasing it out... and he doesn't even have to re-build it. Plus there was evidence in the building that had to be gotten rid of, the hardened command center that was likely used to control the event was there (it was odd that after spending all that money to create this armored command center, that the NYC Mayor chose not to use it in the emergency). Plus there is the SEC evidence stored there on the investigation into Emron, which could have implicated several other firms (...we will never know now), and the 3.3 Billion in gold that was reported to be stored in the basement vaults (of which only 300 million was ever recovered... What happened to the rest, or was it really even there?).

You missed my point.  My point is that no one could have predicted exactly how WTC 1 and 2 were going to come down.  WTC 7 may have gotten damaged, or it may not have.  If it did not get damaged, then exploding it would not be plausible.  And you could not risk leaving evidence if you do not explode it, as the explosives could be found by witnesses.

And your scenario assumes that Silverstein was in on it.  Why would the government disclose this ghoulish plot to anyone who does not need to know?  We do not have a single person, not a one, coming forth admitting to being part of the conspiracy, so they must have been very selective with whom they told.  And now, they are involving a guy who does not need to know.

Anyway, I think I am going to take my own advice and leave you people to your fringe opinions.  As long as I do not hear about this crap in my daily life, I am happy.  You will never convince anyone who matters with this crazy stuff.  I really don't care if you spend the rest of your life with these views, and I am sure you equally do not care what I think, so what's the point?

utilitarian

I will say one last thing.  I suggest you maybe think about whether there is any evidence at all that could possibly change your mind.  Because if there isn't, what's the point of even talking about it?

I mean, seriously, think of something, if found today, that would convince you to doubt your position.  I can answer that for myself.  If several people came forth and admitted they were part of the conspiracy and gave somne verifiable details on how it was cooked up (not just that they said "pull it"), I would have to reconsider my views.

Can you honestly say the same?  I suspect you would brand any evidence as forged.  If you would accept some evidence, what would it have to be?

Anyway, this is more of a rhetorical exercise.  I know I will not get any favorable replies to this, so I will just leave you with that thought.

Cap-Z-ro