CORN BOILER

[tagor]

Hi!  groupies !!

are you sleeping ?


my answer here :


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8510.msg216559#msg216559



merry christmas

[Cloxxki]

Tagor, answering name calling with more name calling won't settle this. Tommey was not using the best of politics to challenge GEET claims, but if there are any doubts, I feel these need to be answered.

What exactly did Tommey construct incorrectly, and what causes his GEET to perform on par with basic vaporization? If you can explain this to the readers of Youtube and OU.com, you may still not win Tommey as a committed GEET soul, but you may win (or prevent of losing) others.

The water-alone claim is outragious, and needs elaborate proof. I'd love to learn of the conditions that are supposed to make this possible. Super high reactor temps, >1500C?

Thanks,
J

[tagor]

Tagor, answering name calling with more name calling won't settle this. Tommey was not using the best of politics to challenge GEET claims, but if there are any doubts, I feel these need to be answered.

What exactly did Tommey construct incorrectly, and what causes his GEET to perform on par with basic vaporization? If you can explain this to the readers of Youtube and OU.com, you may still not win Tommey as a committed GEET soul, but you may win (or prevent of losing) others.

The water-alone claim is outragious, and needs elaborate proof. I'd love to learn of the conditions that are supposed to make this possible. Super high reactor temps, >1500C?

Thanks,
J

I am sorry , but there is no doubt on this technology , see numerous replications !!!

i am not a specialist of this stuff , what can i say ?


"The water-alone claim is outragious, "

I dont know ...
I have to visit mirabella , he claims to do it , wait and see !
months ago , there was a demonstration in paris , i was not present
but i know some people who was there !


best people to contact for gillier-panton is a canadian Andre on econologie.com

[Tommey Reed]

Merry Christmas to all,

Now on the Geet system,

Many Geets claim up to 5 times more efficient then carburated or fuel injected system?

How can anyone make these claims without real data?

My simple vapor carburator did everything that the Pantone Geet system did, running on any type of junk fuel...

In fact my simple design runs on 91% alcohol using a vapor.

I did many test on the claims of Plasma in the Geet system and even a magnet rod that loss its magnet field under heat...

I did carburator test with a 50% contant load of 500watts, using 60 grams of fuel for 5minute test run.

This had a amount of fuel, 40grams in 5 minutes
run time..

I even did my simple vapor and simple Geet system with the same output of 50% load at 5 minute run time, no different then a carburated system....

My simple vapor carburator is better then a Geet, and cheap!

Geets need to show real data  and not a theory!
If there are thousands of Geets out there, then why wont they do real testing?

I say the claims are theory (scam), without real load testing data!!!

My challenge to Geets, is prove your theory!

Many people making money like Paul Pantone $2,500.00 for a week of the theory of GEET.

Without hard data, this shows how stupid people are willing to throw there money away!

If gas has 116,000 btu's of heat energy, you won't get more heat out of it. That would be OVERUNITY!!!

Have a happy Christmas.....

Tommey Reed.

[Johan_1955]

Hi Tagor,

Before Paul and like Gilles: To put water-mist in a Engine Intake-air, for Petrol & Diesel, to avoid detonation, keeping cooler intake-air with better economics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_injection_(engines)

Working system to make crude oil and much more a fuel:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4337711.html

From a plasma (a 2000 degrees C) with Pantone in the intake-manifold is impossible, with fumes & oxygen together without detonation, would be funny if make-able!

Looks to me that Paul was copying some one's?

Regards, Johan