Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Obelix]

Hi !

2sk1548 is not a diode but an N Channel Power Mos-Fet !
Data Sheet :
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheets2/17/175358_1.pdf

Obelix

[WilbyInebriated]

this one really makes me laugh.

Seems to me TK has tested the circuit while you've done jack squat (other than whine). Please tell the class why a slightly different FET will make a huge difference, let alone create OU.

did he forget he said this? is he "playing" stupid? blind sycophant loyalty no matter what? no matter really, it's funny that he made the distinction that we weren't talking about "overunity performance" then but can't seem to now...

[Hoppy]

Further investigation of Aaron's latest Ainslie circuit mod reveals that my replication is very unstable, which resulted in the overheating of my mosfet. The pulses dance around on the scope as a result of this and its almost impossible to get a steady screen. Also, my frequency pot appears not to work properly. I have now managed to repeat the sudden 'oscillatory' effect which causes the mosfet overheating. It looks like the circuit suddenly increases in frequency and duty cycle, although its difficult to see the waveform clearly at the point this happens. I cannot reproduce this effect with the original Aaron / Peter Lindeman design.

I'm not aware that anyone else has built Aaron's latest mod, so it would be interesting if perhaps MH or TK could build this and report their findings.

Hoppy

[Harvey]

Cash Advance:  30.00
Room:             -25.00
Janitor              -2.00
=================
Amt Due:            3.00

Oops, I guess I can add after all...o.O

(Now if I can just find out where I left that voltage...hmmm)

[Asymatrix]

tk never said anything about ou, he was comparing the performance. it's right here. open your eyes and comprehend what has been said. where does he say any thing about ou in that post?

The point is, you spend all of your time labeling TK incompetent, in spite of the volumes of real testing data on real equipment. The point IS that a small mosfet difference makes NO DIFFERENCE in Ainslie's circuit, of which entire point of testing is it's claimed OU. You offer nothing, you do no science, no experiments, and spend all of your energy trying to discredit someone you are clearly psychotically jealous of. Give it a rest.

this one really makes me laugh.

did he forget he said this? is he "playing" stupid? blind sycophant loyalty no matter what? no matter really, it's funny that he made the distinction that we weren't talking about "overunity performance" then but can't seem to now...

The entire point of this thread, and testing the circuit, is it's claimed OU. The idea that you think anything else is relevant regarding the circuit demonstrates how desperate you are to legitimize trolling.

we have been over that, we are critiquing tk's hack of a replication. not mine.

Absolute proof that you are a troll. "Hack replication?" Because of the slightest Mosfet difference?  Laughable and sad.