Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[fuzzytomcat]

I have no idea why there are over 230 pages in this thread.  It should take .99 less than 30 minutes to complete his experiment. All of the scope stuff is meaningless unless .99 can convince me he's a senior EE or has extensive experience with such measurements.

Less than 30 minutes: stick thermistor on top part of mosfet heat sink. Fire up the Ainslie circuit. Measure temp above ambient. Then do the control exp. Remove mosfet. Place battery across mosfet drain/source. Place enough voltage on mosfet gate to get enough DC current to heat it up to the same temp. Calculate power from the control exp. Done! 

Paul

I didn't realize that there was a approve testing method that is used by some university, government or accredited testing agency on the method of measuring current return to battery's. Could you please reference the material a document, PDF or where the text is located so that all members, guests and replicators can use this published information on there replication it appears you know right where it is, and for the life of me I just can't find those documents to share with the "open source" community.

The reason there is 230 pages because of the comments that have no academic reference or value such as your comments ..... If you cant help with documented testing procedures ..... please keep your comments to yourself .....

[WilbyInebriated]

Yawn, more of your ambiguous claims-- handwaving. I did. Answer, again: because it is extremely difficult. Try reading, or wake up.

Now lets see you explain how to conduct such measurements, LOL. I'm betting you will not explain it because you don't know how.

Paul

ambiguous claims? i think you are making shit up now pauly, care to back it up with a quote of my claim?
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?
wow, this is better than some of tk's garbage. let me grab a chair pauly, you have my rapt attention. i'm sure this will be classic 'science'.

i think i'll let you keep talking since you are so sure of yourself. perhaps, for the benefit of the open source community, you could accomodate fuzzy's request?

[PaulLowrance]

ambiguous claims? i think you are making shit up now pauly, care to back it up with a quote of my claim?
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?
wow, this is better than some of tk's garbage. let me grab a chair pauly, i'm sure this will be classic 'science'.

i think i'll let you keep talking since you are so sure of yourself. perhaps, for the benefit of the open source community, you could accomodate fuzzy's request?

LOL, you're not worth my time. Still gibberish replies. Take a look at the difference between our posts. I outlined the method to complete .99 posts. All you do is attempt to crap on people, but you only crap on yourself.

fuzzy is a little mind IMO, and rarely deserves responding to. He wants to talk about battery measurements when we're talking about taking complex scope measurements consisting of pulses.

So, you could not answer the question. As expected.  So far .99 is the only person who's come close to completing correct measurements. You people have no clue how to conduct pulse measurements across such components. The inductance is non-linear. The capacitance is non-linear. It's a complex problem that is not taken lightly. That's why the temperature method is the way to go here.

Paul

[WilbyInebriated]

LOL, you're not worth my time. Still giberish replies. Take a look at the difference between our posts. I outlined the method to complete .99 posts. All you do is attempt to crap on people, but you only crap on yourself.

fuzzy is a little mind IMO, and rarely deserves responding to. He wants to take about battery measurements when we're talking about taking complex scope measurements consisting of pulses.

So, you could not answer the question. As expected.  So far .99 is the only person who's come close to completing correct measurements. You people have no clue how to conduct pulse measurements across such components. The inductance is non-linear. The capacitance is non-linear. It's a complex problem that is not taken lightly. That's why the temperature method is the way to go here.

Paul

gibberish? which word did you have trouble understanding pauly?
so you ARE making shit up then. where is my ambiguous claim(s)? i asked you a simple question(s) and you respond with strawmen and ad hom...

one more time then.
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?

[PaulLowrance]

so you ARE making shit up then. where is my ambiguous claim(s)? i asked you a simple question and you respond with strawmen and ad hom...

Once again you are blind. I quoted you. Try reading. In our short little discussion you've said nothing, but ambigous statements such as, "what kind of nonsense is this?"   You can't prove it's nonsense. Where's your math, or measurement techniques? Show something so real EE's can get a real laugh.

Still no answer about how to take such measurements, huh. IMO you're a child next to .99, and I say that in all seriousness.

Paul