Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dllabarre]

It seemed to work.
Also, I noticed that on this page Antanas has links to dozens of devices but not to the Yoke device.

http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/lithuania_experiment/


I believe it's under the Lithuania Experiments link.
DonL

[zcsaba77]

AFAIK = As Far As I Know.

New brass costs ~$10/kg today in New Jersey and Chicago's metal shops and $12 in Frankfurt, Germany's shops. 
Online stores can be even more expensive, e.g. see here for an example of $24/kg for a 24x24x0.75inch brass plate.

Scrap prices are of course less than new stock brass prices, but the chances of finding a whole 50x50x2cm brass plate or a 50x2cm disk in a scrap/junk yard, are very low.
Brass shavings or small pieces are not a problem to find at a scrap yard for $8/kg, but not many people have the facility to purify and melt them at 1650ºF in order to cast a 50x2cm disk.

To obtain two brass disks like Mr. Kapanadze has used, an average Joe would need to buy two square brass plates 50x50x2cm from new stock and cut out two 50x2cm disks out of them.
Each such plate has the volume of 5000cm³. Now, the density of brass is 8.5g/cm³, thus 5000cm³ of brass has mass of 42.5kg.
42.5kg of brass costs $425 in Chicago. Two such plates will cost $850 + cutting/lathing costs - leftover scrap value.

...and I'm not even adding the cost of the steel disks.

Hi

Again me, I try ask price from one store who selling varios metal plates, how much is brass plate. Do u think need 2cm thick brass, I think is 2cm thick with steel (and brass), because shaft look maybe 30mm diameter, and disc looks thiner.

[verpies]

Again me, I try ask price from one store who selling varios metal plates, how much is brass plate. Do u think need 2cm thick brass, I think is 2cm thick with steel (and brass), because shaft look maybe 30mm diameter, and disc looks thiner.

Do a proportional video analysis. Do a screenshot and draw some boxes across the outer diameter of the disks and across the thicknesses of the disks, and divide/normalize to the known 500mm diameter to obtain the thickness by proportion.

If McFreey's is correct then it should not matter if the brass is only 12mm thick. If Hoppy is right - then the thickness matters even less.

[Grumage]

And maybe that's the trick. Just another coincidence:

No matter what input wave type is, the resonant output is SINUS WAVE

Is that so?

The parametric transformer consists obviously of a two-part core like the two-part core of the yoke device. Now my problem is, where can I see a two-part transformer core on the Kapanadze device? Or could there be another way to do this with an ordinary off-the-shelf E-core transformer? (Will keep thinking ...)

If my understanding of this functional principle is correct then the intent of the divided core is to have a loose magnetic coupling between the primary coil and the secondary coil. But it does not really matter how this loose magnetic coupling is achieved (by having a gap between the two half cores or by rotating one half core 90 degrees with respect to the other). So the current supplied to the primary coil is just to excite the secondary coil, which then produces its current (or voltage) by itself from thin air (due to parametric excitation). Now someone try this and report a working OU device.

And furthermore, why is it that the toroidal shape of the yoke device reminds me on the toroidal shape of the Marks device? Don't say that's just another coincidence.

Hi All I am new to this forum but have been studying and trying to replicate for a number of years off and on. Was very interested in the parametric transformer so I had a go at making one! A picture is worth a thousand words a you tube much more!!! Please visit and see the result for yourselves.        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK3OiVfwmoQ

I have been testing this thing off and on today with all sorts of unusual results. The amplifier module is an off the shelf Mono audio amp rated at 40 W. First thing was that by replacing said module for an 18 W unit, there was no voltage gain. So I went back to the 40. You can see noise on the scope trace, I wonder if this is what is acounting for the double voltage output? Another unusual trait is that after a short time the voltage starts to drop back to something more expected. If you then change up the frequency range and come back you get the same bright bulb dimming back. It is as though the Ferrite needs a ping as I call it! I am testing at low voltage inputs at the moment because I can look at waveforms with the scope, but I do wonder whether it is the high voltage/frequency that energises the Ferrite into a short burst's of energy much higher than are inputted? My transformer is a 1 to 1 to 1 ratio throughout but with 10 volts P/P I get nearly 24 V P/P out. This value was also verified using a FWBR and cap to measure at DC level. Result 12 VDC!

I also noted that if a square wave is inputted you get a sort of Sinus out.

I hope you find my research of some use, all Grist to the mill I hope.

[zcsaba77]

Do a proportional video analysis. Do a screenshot and draw some boxes across the outer diameter of the disks and across the thicknesses of the disks, and divide/normalize to the known 500mm diameter to obtain the thickness by proportion.

If McFreey's is correct then it should not matter if the brass is only 12mm thick. If Hoppy is right - then the thickness matters even less.

brass thick is matter?