Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[yfree]

Kapanadze speaks of resonance in the resonance does anyone know what that means?

maybe it is the key

Leo48

Yes, it is the key.
The best answer to this question is given in the attached new paper by William J. McFreey.

[elementSix]

Thanks yfree.  I always appreciate help in trying to understand this.  I think I just got a little more info in my head and got the whole workings of this phenomenon.
This is a questions for Grumage and Zeit, because I value your input.  Weather its in opposition or in a helping way. 
I was reading about how Tesla saw this radiant spike when working with Edison's linemen.  The moment of switch closure when the HV DC hit the long lines of resistance, the radiant spike would appear right at that instant.  He also says that the moment the electrons start moving in the line, the spike disappears.  The current stops the radiant spike from forming.  He calls this Electrostatic Force.  So in a way the HV DC creates this Electrostatic force to appear at the moment the Impulse is created, but the current makes it stop.  So in a way the a very quick and abrupt HV DC impulse that travels over a wire creates a form of electrostatic radiant energy.  Now this is my question.  Do you believe that if the current was eliminated completely, would it be easier to create the radiant spike?  Look at it in just a different way of Resonance with the Current.  Isn't that what Resonance is, when there is no current being consumed in the circuit.  Or am I completely off the course? 

[NickZ]

  Ringing the Bell...
 
  Electrical Resonance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resonance

  Will it help to find the answer as to how TK builds his devices? Who knows...
But, if what you're looking for is just a definition, the one above will do.

  It is possible that some of the Kapanadze video footage has been altered, or removed afterwards, from their original content, so not to give the trick(s) away.
  It also seams more than strange that none of his devices have been commercialized up to this date. After an over 10 years span, and thousands of people viewing both videos and devices..

  Zeit: Got your PM.  I'll let you know.

[Hoppy]

Does that mean you have no ideas on the subject or that there is a thread that talks about Current Resonance??
I mean it must be the latter, cause I know we talk about all sorts of shit on this forum.  So why does the word Current Resonance  bother you so??

What are the different types of resonance?  there aren't just one, there are a few.  So what category would current resonance be under??

If you do a search, you will see that there are threads covering this topic. I've said before that this thread deviates too much and yes often into s..t topics divorced from what this thread was opened to discuss.

[Zeitmaschine]

Dear Zeitmaschine.

What are your thoughts about trying with a couple of older Car coils or older motorcycle ignition coils?? And an Avremenco plug onto each earthy side?

Cheers Grum.

So far my thoughts are non-working, as it seems.


An excerpt form Principle of work of Tariel Kapanadze's device:

Electrical current - this is speed of movement of electrical charge at a point! So, we have a problem to solve: light up the incandescent light bulb.

How can we do that?

1. Apply a potential difference from a direct current source, for example an accumulator.
2. Apply alternating potential difference from the power grid.
3. But we can do it in a different way too: put the incandescent light bulb in a coil connected to a high frequency circuit and the light bulb will light up without applying any potential difference!

In the last case, there is no electric current going to the ground, the potential ground source!

In this case the charges, the electrons, will be bouncing at high frequency and will be breaking the crystal net of the metal.

That is good.

If we add another incandescent light bulb to the circuit, by taking to cables from the light bulb that is in the inductor and connect them to a second light bulb situated outside of the inductor. The second light bulb will not light but will just warm up.

The second light bulb will not light up, because the power of the bouncing charged particles is not enough to create bouncing in the charged particles in the small volume of the string of the second incandescent bulb.

We see again the exact frictional process.

But if we connect one of the connections to the second incandescent light bulb to any big iron object, and even better, to a ground, as done by Mr. Kapanadze in the video, then the picture changes immediately.

We have a big free source of charged particles, this is our Earth.

We do not have to push in or push out this limited amount of charged particles being in the small wolfram coil of the light bulb. We create on the free end, an opposite potential, reaching hundreds of volts, in the same way as it is being created in the small wolfram coil situated in the high frequency inductor.

The most important thing we are looking for, is to create - when we have an unlimited amount of charged particles, coming from a big object - resonance of the charged particles!!!, in the mass of the thick copper wire, "created" via the first and the second inductions.


Now compare this with The Single-Wire Electric Power Transmission (Avramenko's plug):

So, the motion of charged particles is the current. But there are both the wattful current and wattless current. To create the free energy system it is necessary to transform the wattless current to wattful current.

What is the difference in those two versions of current? When the charged particles are moving along wire thanks to electromotive force of potential difference, it is not the reason for loss of power in the source because the electric field of the primary source provides the work to move charged particles without any power loss. A closed electrical circuit is the reason to consume the potential difference of the source. It is possible to separate the load current from source circuit.