Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 180 Guests are viewing this topic.

Sprocket

Quote from: dllabarre on July 04, 2010, 11:56:05 PM
The big difference between the 2 reports in this video is the input Watts.
Was 172.3 and now 1059.
All the other numbers are reasonably close to each other.

JLN is still measuring the input after the variac.
From his new video summary "To measure the electrical INPUT POWER, I have used the high end energy meter Voltcraft Energy Logger 4000F connected at the output of the variac."

I'd like to see the number of watt measured before the variac.

Don

I wonder why people put such stock in a "high end energy meter" - apart from obviously being more expensive, where's the proof of its increased accuracy?

What really cracks me up is that this thread has gone from a frenetic 3-5 pages-per-day, to a dead-stall - what has changed, the vast majority of the posters weren't replicating anyway, so no reason that stop waxing-lyrically :)

I got another MOT (2 actually) to test against my 'faulty' one - turns out there's nothing wrong with it!  I also got some GDT's before the latest 'news'.  I managed to light 5 100W bulbs in series, along with a 1KW heater element - am I the only one that has tried heater elements, or did others just not report trying them 'cos their results sucked like mine? - BUT their brightness was abysmal.  Worse, left running for about 10min I noticed  a wisp of smoke coming from one of the bulb-holders.  I thought it was one of the GDT's about to expire, instead it was the wire insulation resting against it that was starting to melt!!! Oh yeah, the MOT was also overheating by this time as well......

vrand

Quote from: Sprocket on July 05, 2010, 08:36:11 PM
I wonder why people put such stock in a "high end energy meter" - apart from obviously being more expensive, where's the proof of its increased accuracy?

What really cracks me up is that this thread has gone from a frenetic 3-5 pages-per-day, to a dead-stall - what has changed, the vast majority of the posters weren't replicating anyway, so no reason that stop waxing-lyrically :)

I got another MOT (2 actually) to test against my 'faulty' one - turns out there's nothing wrong with it!  I also got some GDT's before the latest 'news'.  I managed to light 5 100W bulbs in series, along with a 1KW heater element - am I the only one that has tried heater elements, or did others just not report trying them 'cos their results sucked like mine? - BUT their brightness was abysmal.  Worse, left running for about 10min I noticed  a wisp of smoke coming from one of the bulb-holders.  I thought it was one of the GDT's about to expire, instead it was the wire insulation resting against it that was starting to melt!!! Oh yeah, the MOT was also overheating by this time as well......

Thank you for the update.   :)

It looks like you are the only one testing with the heater elements, please let us know what you find out.

Yeah, the Kapanadze unit still has lots of possibilities, one being that it self ran after startup!   :)

Regards, Mike   

bolt

Quote from: vrand on July 05, 2010, 09:06:46 PM
Thank you for the update.   :)

It looks like you are the only one testing with the heater elements, please let us know what you find out.

Yeah, the Kapanadze unit still has lots of possibilities, one being that it self ran after startup!   :)

Regards, Mike

Over 50 public Kapagen replications, only 3 showed promise. One of which was JLN now proven to be a "non OU event" which leaves one or two others to validate and recheck their meters.  The odds stacked against them for anything remarkable.

Thread now closed!


LtBolo

Quote from: bolt on July 05, 2010, 10:42:11 PM
Over 50 public Kapagen replications...

Kapagen replications...not Kapanadze replications. Or more to the point...replications of an attempted replication of a rumored OU technology patterned upon Tesla.

And herein lies the problem: too much hardware, and not enough understanding.

But Tesla said it best:

“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search … I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him 90 percent of his labor.” â€" Nikola Tesla, New York Times, October 19, 1931