Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[angryScientist]

It's my opinion that the High Voltage Wave Former is the key to this device. If I were to bet I would say that without the wave former no anomalous energy can be obtained. In fact, with out the wave former this device could be a stander oscillator/mixer found, in function that is, in any radio including FM, AM, and Continuous Wave.

I would also be so bold as to say the transformer is not that important except that it have a fairly reasonable Q, that is, a couple of tens magnification factor. Nothing spectacular. Else the load would have to be so constant that it could not be modified with out throwing the device completely out of tune, which doesn't seem to be the case.

Another thing to keep in mind is that a spark will not form at all at normal atmospheric temperature and pressure with any voltage less than ~ 5,000V - 6,000V volts. So the High Voltage coil could be adjusted to trip the spark gap only when the oscillations have reached approximately the maximum amount of magnification they can. Once the coil has stored enough energy the Wave Former pushes it out as a brief DC pulse into the load.

[angryScientist]

It's said that all the energy stored in the coil due to the magnification factor is invisible. That is, even though the energy is there it can not be used for anything be cause it can not be extracted.

I believe this is the way to get the energy out of that circuit. What was invisible is now usable. How it is gotten out is the "secrete."

[forest]

It's said that all the energy stored in the coil due to the magnification factor is invisible. That is, even though the energy is there it can not be used for anything be cause it can not be extracted.

I believe this is the way to get the energy out of that circuit. What was invisible is now usable. How it is gotten out is the "secrete."

AGREE.Moreover I think ferrite is not required but has just various advantages. In fact we could use soft iron pipe

[exnihiloest]

I used the term 'capacity' instead of 'capacitor' intentionally, to distinguish between a 2 pole device vs a 1 pole device.

There is no real difference. A one pole capacity is a two poles capacitor whose the second pole is a fictive electrode at infinity, considered storing no charge and enclosing the first one.
See http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8977.msg266455#msg266455

...
In that sense, the earth is a capacity and the coil is a capacity...

I agree

...
I am suggesting that the 2 cap experiment gives us a peek at how a strong charge gradient will behave...and specifically...it will cause more charge to travel from the source to the sink than the sink can contain.
...

I think there are many misunderstandings about capacitors.

In the two cap experiment, at the moment the charge is maximal in C2 and null in C1, the voltage at C2 terminals is higher than at the first one, because the energy conservation implies that
W=1/2*C1*U1²=1/2*C2*U2². C2 being less than C1, U2 is higher.
But only a part of the initial charge of C1 is transfered in C2. Why? Because energy in a capacitor is equal to the work for separating positive and negative charges. This work is the mechanical work done against the Coulomb force to move negative charges away from positive charges, i.e W=F*Q*dl where dl is the gap between the electrodes. In the big capacitor C1, dl is less than in C2, therefore the same energy in C1 is represented by a bigger quantity of separated charges than in C2. On other words, the positive and negative charges having to be more separated in C2 than in C1 because of a larger gap, less charges are concerned in C2 than in C1, in order the work for separating the charges to be the same in the two cases.

The mistake is to think a capacitor as being a reservoir of charges, when it is globally neutral because there is the same quantity of positive and negative charges on each electrode. The conservation of charges applies only to this quantity, which is zero.
The capacitor is only a system for an equal quantity of positive and negative charges to be maintained separated from one another, i.e storing the energy that was used against the Coulomb force for separating the charges.
It follows that adding charges by connecting only one terminal of the capacitor to a high potential or to the earth or to whatever will not change anything. Only the quantity of separated charges is meaningful.

[forest]

One terminal to Earth , second one to the source of radiant energy 
It should work, I proved it for myself in small quantity (no OU) just by using Avramenko plug which made potential difference between ground and second capacitor plate.