Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[cosmoLV]

What will it cost?

This technology are cheep, for 7KV device something around 50 USD - this is price for parts (something around that)

P.S. Everything is possible

[core]

This technology are cheep, for 7KV device something around 50 USD - this is price for parts (something around that)

P.S. Everything is possible

What do you mean by 'Everything'?

BTW - On the Russian site it was mentioned that Tariel was hospitalized and was receiving a blood transfusion. I got that from Google translate.

Is it true? and if so how is he doing?

Respectfully,

Core

[exnihiloest]

...
http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/
...

Again and again the same errors.

In the hypothesis of the linear case, i.e when the circuit parameters such as permeability or magnetic domains are not modified by fields, fields superpose, they simply add (vectorially), and only a change of field strength can be recovered by a coil.

Two errors are linked to the ignorance of this fact.

1) If permanent magnets are static, their presence in a magnetic circuit with coils plays no role for the dynamical functioning. It is the reason why the MEG failed.
And if they move, then Lenz law applies to the coils, an opposite field is created and it is the mechanical work to move the permanent magnets against this "counter-field", that provides the energy.

Other example: when a field from a powering coil nullifies the magnetic field from a permanent magnet in a region where there is a probe coil, and we interrupt the current in the powering coil, it is often said that the field from the permanent magnet "rebuilds", and the probe coil can recover a signal and energy provided by the permanent magnet. It is false. The energy is not coming from the permanent magnet "rebuilding the field" but from the collapse of the field from the powering coil, that superposed to the permanent magnet field. One can remove the permanent magnet, there will be no difference from the viewpoint of the coil (always presumed the linear case).

2) The magnetic effects are always bi-directional and symmetric due to the isotropy of the magnetic field along the path of the field lines. If the powering of a coil magnetizes a distant ferromagnetic body, and we interrupt the current, then the collapsing field of the ferromagnetic body will induced a current in the coil. The site above asserts the contrary ("Field Bi2 does not penetrate inductor windings"). If Field Bi2 didn't penetrate "inductor windings", inversely the "inductor windings" could not magnetize the ferromagnetic "triblet" that generates Bi2. The matter of this site is completely wrong.

And we are far from Kapanaze's device.

[penno64]

HI EX,

If you could spare the time to look at the matrix website and in particular, the experiments of
MISHAIL. His you tube account is mishail1971.

Could it also be measurement errors that account for his findings ?

Where has DOLE gone.

Did any one else notice that in his last youtube ( user name is xdole ), he had his kapa coil sitting
perpendicular to a coil that appears to be his "collector", I wonder if that is what is hidden in kapa's green box.

Just a thought.

Also, madsatbg has shown a novel way to create HV for arcs, He uses a CFL light bulb then into
what seems a flyback via a large resistor. Intersting.

Regards, Penno

[broli]

Again and again the same errors.

In the hypothesis of the linear case, i.e when the circuit parameters such as permeability or magnetic domains are not modified by fields, fields superpose, they simply add (vectorially), and only a change of field strength can be recovered by a coil.

Two errors are linked to the ignorance of this fact.

1) If permanent magnets are static, their presence in a magnetic circuit with coils plays no role for the dynamical functioning. It is the reason why the MEG failed.
And if they move, then Lenz law applies to the coils, an opposite field is created and it is the mechanical work to move the permanent magnets against this "counter-field", that provides the energy.

Other example: when a field from a powering coil nullifies the magnetic field from a permanent magnet in a region where there is a probe coil, and we interrupt the current in the powering coil, it is often said that the field from the permanent magnet "rebuilds", and the probe coil can recover a signal and energy provided by the permanent magnet. It is false. The energy is not coming from the permanent magnet "rebuilding the field" but from the collapse of the field from the powering coil, that superposed to the permanent magnet field. One can remove the permanent magnet, there will be no difference from the viewpoint of the coil (always presumed the linear case).

2) The magnetic effects are always bi-directional and symmetric due to the isotropy of the magnetic field along the path of the field lines. If the powering of a coil magnetizes a distant ferromagnetic body, and we interrupt the current, then the collapsing field of the ferromagnetic body will induced a current in the coil. The site above asserts the contrary ("Field Bi2 does not penetrate inductor windings"). If Field Bi2 didn't penetrate "inductor windings", inversely the "inductor windings" could not magnetize the ferromagnetic "triblet" that generates Bi2. The matter of this site is completely wrong.

And we are far from Kapanaze's device.

Still keeping that anti progressive agenda on high priority I see.

If the distance between coil and ferromagnetic material is large enough the coil can be completely ignorant of the FM. Perhaps you forgot that EM is not instantaneous but propagates at a certain speed. If you shoot out flux you can switch off the coil before the response flux of the FM hits the coil back. This has nothing to do with this thread, but it's atleast more constructuve than your "you're all wrong and I'm always right" BS posts.