Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[iceweller]

I would like to underline again this concept with comparisons which should help:

an electromagnetic field is generated by any moving charge which in turn creates effects comparable to inertial consequences.
Electrostatic effects, mostly uninvestigated, are void of these effects.

We can charge a Leyden jar, disassemble it removing the conducting surfaces, and hold the dielectric in our hands without getting a shock. It holds the charge. When we reassemble it, we can discharge it regularly. This is because the "strain" on the dielectric is conducted by the metallic armature which in turn reflects the charge, hence the field, with positive or negative potential.

[dole]

what kind of spark gap or solid state generator do you use for your "longitudinal  electromagnetic wave" youtube video? I cant hear any sparks ?

Ordinary SG and the rotary SG, but you see, in this video, there is totally different type of energy, pure, like surrounding. I used it just for the POC. There is many type of energy we even do not dream about.

Back to TK device. I have a small MOSFET version of the pump from the 18V to 500V (I may produce same shooting effect like Ismael with discharge of 500V and 270uF charge from 18V, spends 0,1 A in 30 sec to go there). TK is initially pulsing from the 220V, or more. What is steel missing for the TK device is proper induction coupling primary/secondary in resonance. For now I am only studding the primary pulse for testing a correct impedance, you should not use R. Sometimes I plan a SIDAC / IGBT version. (But this is not actually what I am searching for, somehow dirty, conventional) anyway I would advice everyone to look at the TK patent again now. It does not need to be TT like you may think. Ferrite or steel core is needed because of SG pulse strength and arcing (pulse transformer) it is only in the input coil. Coax is needed to protect loss, capacity and all mentioned before. Now you easy see condenser charge through diodes; discharge section and coil polarity. The whole energy generator is inside the GB outside is only filter and ground connection for coax. Think of pulse to swing, when it swings back you will have sum of surrounding potential and pulsed magnetic field.

*I have one question:  How perfect damped wave should look like?

d.

[iceweller]

"As stabilizing the magnetic field difference by the help of frequency stabilizer, this circuit line also converts the energy which is moving indipendently in the air at the second bobbin designed within this line to electric energy"

   Here is accessing the external "source" reference which is the only conclusive point.

   However the rest of the patent description is very rough. So rough that it is very easy to be confused by the term "filter" and "frequency adjuster" repeated so often (not considering the English). I've been over it several times but it can be seen in one way or the other. Though I have my understanding of it, without specific definitions it's not conclusive at all.

  For example, the feedback and output are labeled as positive and named "phase" (!), but is connected to a "frequency adjuster". We know the output is a train of HF pulses at 50Hz, fed through a smoothing filter then transformed back down to 12V and rectified to close the loop for the GB. Quite a leap from the patent "boxes".

[dole]

For example, the feedback and output are labeled as positive and named "phase" (!), but is connected to a "frequency adjuster". We know the output is a train of HF pulses at 50Hz, fed through a smoothing filter then transformed back down to 12V and rectified to close the loop for the GB. Quite a leap from the patent "boxes".

Sorry for rude interruption, eyes usually sees what brain wish, so me to, patent refers to a feedback for the capacitor recharge from the secondary regarding coil polarity and generating pump, 12V close loop in the video is just the voltage regulator from a tractor, easy to see if you have one in a backyard

d.

[iceweller]

Sorry for rude interruption, eyes usually sees what brain wish, so me to, patent refers to a feedback for the capacitor recharge from the secondary regarding coil polarity and generating pump, 12V close loop in the video is just the voltage regulator from a tractor, easy to see if you have one in a backyard

d.

   So you are saying that the "black box" in the GB video contains an AC to DC regulator from a tractor alternator? If so (if the regulator accepts a 220V range as input), it still serves as a step down transformer and recitifier - so we're saying the same thing - or did you mean to point out something else?

  I am aware that the patent indicates a feedback directly to the large capacitor. What I meant to point out is that the outputs are labeled + and - but contemporarily referred to phase and ground in the patent. The output of "bobbin" 10 doesn't look like DC, thus the "frequency adjuster" 11.

   However as I said, we can look at the patent with a different view (try flipping it around), and that is that the part labeled "exit" is not just the output, but the real "input" of the device, so that bobbin 10 (after the "frequency adjuster") is first inducing a field into bobbin 6, which then does what it needs to do, discharging the HV through spark gap 3 after being rectified by the "filters" into the cap and when the coil 10 is denergized, the reverse happens (so the charge in the cap is used to drive coil 6), actually gaining from this exchange and only then it becomes an output. The + and - should simply be labeled phase and ground to avoid confusion with the real DC component. Let's say the device works by energizing both coils at different frequencies (resonance in resonance), not just one to another and then picking up whatever is captured by this mechanism.

   Maybe it's my way of thinking and understanding the concept and of course may be wrong, but it makes much more sense this way in my mind, though as I said, without a reference it's inconclusive and confusing.