Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 252 Guests are viewing this topic.

itsu

T-1000,

QuoteOk,one time to see is much better than 100 times to hear:

P.S. It is my b'day today...


Thanks, i agree, 1 picture tells more then.....  well you know.


Happy Birthday,         ;D

Regards Itsu

jbignes5

@t1000


Thats some interesting results. But I have to ask why the two frequencies? Has anyone reproduced the Kapandze device as being what you see instead of just supposition? It's very clear what he was doing even though the video is crappy. I am re-examining the video as we speak and should have a better understanding of the process.

The use of ferrite of iron is counter productive in this instance. However there are many instances why you would want to use it, especially if you wanted to separate the magnetic field from the electric. But in the case of the version of Kapanadze there is no loop for the magnetic field to stay inside of the core. In my honest opinion this is the only way to get rid of the magnetic field since ferrite or iron tends to soak up the magnetic field and compresses the field inside of the core. It has to be a loop to separate the field completely and I thought it was the reason stivep settled on the yoke.

Very interesting that at the end of the Dollard video he shows how the filed looks around the solenoid coil. Sound familiar?

T-1000

Quote from: jbignes5 on June 20, 2012, 03:17:03 PM
@t1000


Thats some interesting results. But I have to ask why the two frequencies? Has anyone reproduced the Kapandze device as being what you see instead of just supposition? It's very clear what he was doing even though the video is crappy. I am re-examining the video as we speak and should have a better understanding of the process.

For NMR conditions you need to have 2 oscilating magnetic fields on 90 degrees to each other. Please look carefuly what happens to selenoid transformer when oscilating curent transformer field from spark gap is presented over 90 degrees to windings... :)

jbignes5

Quote from: T-1000 on June 20, 2012, 03:35:39 PM
For NMR conditions you need to have 2 oscilating magnetic fields on 90 degrees to each other. Please look carefuly what happens to selenoid transformer when oscilating curent transformer field from spark gap is presented over 90 degrees to windings... :)


Ok but didn't you find out that NMR is destructive to the core via unequal polarization? It tends to polarize all cores and ruins the results eventually. This is why I suspect that Kapanadze used brass sleeve as the core. It would reflect the electric field back out while maintaining the magnetic field of the "C". Isn't brass used in electrostatics?


As I could see the center tube was brass like in the Kapanadze device with non conductive epoxy to affix it to the steel frame. The magnetic field in this case was around the device as a "C". This would draw the field around the whole device. As you could see the epoxy failed on one end of the brass tube and that caused a failure of the "OO" field he was trying to make. I doubt this made it stop in fact it probably made it work better. I'm still working on the coils but one coil I'm sure of now. It is what me and Itsu are testing. 1 wire excitation of the coils to enhance the field for magnetic strengthening.

@Itsu could you try brass in the center of the Katcher coil instead of the copper tube?

yfree

All the proposed approaches of Tesla, discussed here, are the ones that have been published. These technologies have nothing to do with alternative energy production. They were revolutionary then. They are now considered standard and some of them are even obsolete. The published Tesla technologies are, or were, intended for electrical energy generation (various dynamos), transformation, conversion or transmission and reception. They do not release or provide additional energy as understood here. This was shown over and over on this forum and other forums as well. This does not mean that these technologies cannot be used as helping tools in the construction of devices that do release additional energy. Tesla technologies that were used in these (additional energy releasing) devices, namely the magnifying transmitter and the Pierce Arrow power unit, are not in the public domain. Only a few managed to come across these technologies: Hubbard (who visited Tesla), Michel Meyer, Steven Mark, Floyd Sweet, Tariel Kapanadze, SR193, Magnacoaster and  W. McFreey. These inventors use this unpublished Tesla technology.
Happy birthday, T-1000.