Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Hoppy]

The one and obvious question : can you fool clamp meter ?  I don't think so, that's why I have thrown away some theories, because of this assumption. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Yes!

From Wikipedia: Less-expensive clamp meters use a rectifier circuit which actually reads mean current, but is calibrated to display the RMS current corresponding to the measured mean, giving a correct RMS reading only if the current is a sine wave. For other waveforms readings will be incorrect; when these simpler meters are used with non-sinusoidal loads such as the ballasts used with fluorescent lamps or high-intensity discharge lamps or most modern computer and electronic equipment, readings can be quite inaccurate. Meters which respond to true RMS rather than mean current are described as "true RMS".

[forest]

Yes!

From Wikipedia: Less-expensive clamp meters use a rectifier circuit which actually reads mean current, but is calibrated to display the RMS current corresponding to the measured mean, giving a correct RMS reading only if the current is a sine wave. For other waveforms readings will be incorrect; when these simpler meters are used with non-sinusoidal loads such as the ballasts used with fluorescent lamps or high-intensity discharge lamps or most modern computer and electronic equipment, readings can be quite inaccurate. Meters which respond to true RMS rather than mean current are described as "true RMS".

Well, did you tested such cheap clamp meters ? Unfortunately mine is damaged , but wouldn't it measure fluctuating current in case of high frequency ? Something like DMM near the spark gap ?

[Hoppy]

Well, did you tested such cheap clamp meters ? Unfortunately mine is damaged , but wouldn't it measure fluctuating current in case of high frequency ? Something like DMM near the spark gap ?

Yes. Using a DMM near a spark gap is a no-no.

[TinselKoala]

There are many ways to "fool" clamp meters.... such as clamping them on the wrong wire, for example, like a certain Italian cold fusion claimant has done. The frequency and waveform response issue only affects those who try to use these meters.... honestly.

However, anyone who depends on the readings from a clampon meter, no matter how "true RMS" or expensive it is.... to support "overunity" or "free energy" measurements is going a bit too far. Only a proper instantaneous power measurement, integrated over a reasonably long time period to give an _energy flow_ during that time, should be used for support of "overunity" claims. This type of measurement can't be made with clampon meters, "Kill-a-Watt" inline power meters, or such. It needs real power analyzers like the Clarke-Hess, and/or proper oscilloscope measurements of instantaneous voltage and current, using either actual current probes with good HF response (very expensive) or monitoring current by voltage drop across a current-viewing precision resistor (very difficult to do properly with high-frequency or complex oscillating waveforms.)

[xenomorphlabs]

There are many ways to "fool" clamp meters.... such as clamping them on the wrong wire, for example, like a certain Italian cold fusion claimant has done. The frequency and waveform response issue only affects those who try to use these meters.... honestly.

However, anyone who depends on the readings from a clampon meter, no matter how "true RMS" or expensive it is.... to support "overunity" or "free energy" measurements is going a bit too far. Only a proper instantaneous power measurement, integrated over a reasonably long time period to give an _energy flow_ during that time, should be used for support of "overunity" claims. This type of measurement can't be made with clampon meters, "Kill-a-Watt" inline power meters, or such. It needs real power analyzers like the Clarke-Hess, and/or proper oscilloscope measurements of instantaneous voltage and current, using either actual current probes with good HF response (very expensive) or monitoring current by voltage drop across a current-viewing precision resistor (very difficult to do properly with high-frequency or complex oscillating waveforms.)

All i can say is "EXACTLY".Insufficient measurement considerations are the cause for nearly all OU-false alarms.