Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dmtechdm]

Hi to all,
i`ve been on this subject for years, doing countless experiments devoting my time energy and money trying to make the difference and make this world the better place.I`m not in it for money glory  or fame it is just the promise to my son who passed away five years ago.I did a LOT of research and am not a person who corresponds or post or like to talk a much ,but since this thread is going into direction that I hopped it would not after unsuccesfully trying to contact prominent members I feel responsible to post my findings on this subject that should be concern for all trying to accomplish free energy this way.What I found out is process used in greedy Georgian man and probably many others Fe devices ,it is nuclear magnetic resonator that becomes powerful electron emitter.Does it work-YES,but process of magnetically aligning atom domeins in ferrite , iron and some other dopped materials coused by resonant Rf energy unfortunatly with Rf energy emitts Alpha, Beta, Gama and to certain extent Xrays and N emmision. Is it free energy,YES, I don`t think that  is recognized in main stream science and as I see that some members of this forum are going the same way I did , it is my obligation and responsability to warn you about health hazards involved.During my research I did expose myself to ionizing radiation from this technology and I do have health issues as a result.I don`t understand sick mind of people willingly exposing many others inocent bystanders to high level of radiation just becouse of greed.
I did confirm all above mentioned radiation in number of different ways,it probably can be shielded and be used in safe way ,but certanly not in  basement,garage or home lab project.
Again  I do apologize for not sharing my work earlier, God is my wittnes I wanted to help this world and make my little contribution for above mentioned reason but I hate correspondence and and am not
good in dealing with people,please understand.
sorry about spelling

[verpies]

do you think TK has a set of hidden batteries to power the small motor which turns the two discs via the pulley belt?

That would be the best choice of M.O. if it were not for the constant frequency saw-noise (independent from RPMs) and incomplete welds at the bottom of the aluminum pedestals that support these bearings.
These incomplete welds leave gaps between the pedestal and the base plate, that are big enough to look into or insert something thin.  See the video here.

P.S.
If I were trying to hide belts in those plummer/pillow block bearing housings and in those pedestals, then I would make damn sure that they were welded tightly so some nosy guy does not take a peak inside or insert a hacksaw blade there.

[Hoppy]

Yes, there is sufficient space there to conceal batteries. Also the bottom of these channels is plated over with sheet metal, which adds credence to concealment theory in that space (why do the extra work & cost to plate them over, otherwise ?).
Then, there is a round hole in one of these channels visible and in one of the video clips there is a man staring inside it. See here.
It could house them but because the box is aluminum it would shield the changing magnetic field generated in those boxes by 40% (assuming 50Hz and 3mm thick walls) or 57% (assuming 50Hz and 5mm thick walls). I marked those walls in yellow on your diagram.
What's the size of that air gap in your opinion ?

Also note that the aquarium device has a small automotive alternator attached to it , while the open-frame device has a big generator attached.  Wouldn't that difference account for the difference in acceleration?
Yes. there appears to be very little friction. However unloaded alternators turn very freely. The belt drive alone would present more mechanical resistance than the alternator.
That would not make sense since the magnetic field close to the axis could not produce a torque on it. To maximize torque of the Bedini type motor, the magnetic poles have to be as close to the rims of the disks as possible, e.g. poles created by embedded permanent magnets near the perimeter of the disks, just like you had drawn.
Yes, from both ends of the shaft-coil, I reckon
I have no proof, but I think that a HF signal applied to the toroid is eventually applied to this shaft-coil.
Neither can I.
Yes, through some kind of rotary-transformer mechanism.
I strongly suspect that a different set if orthogonal windings is concealed under the ordinary toroidal winding.

Again taking your points in turn: -

Agreed that the ali would shield the magnetic field but having built a few monopole motors over the years, I can be confident that TK could 'size'  his power coil to ensure that this loss will still result in the performance we see in the video. Its also possible that the front face of the boxing facing the rotor magnets is made of a very thin plate as it would not necessarily have to be the same thickness as the sides of the boxing.

The air gap looks narrow to me, which would enhance torque to help overcome the effect of magnetic coupling losses due to the ali shielding between coil and magnets.

Agreed, the size difference of the generators should have a corresponding effect on acceleration. However, I'm not convinced the generators are being loaded to any great extent because if they were, the motor would just not perform as seen due to lack of torque. The lamps are more likely being run through an inverter controlled / switched by the generator output.

I agree its odds on that there is a coil in the tube under the toroid.

PS: The electro-magnets I'm envisaging would still be positioned as shown on my schematic. The coil windings would just be wound around each iron core using a continuous length of wire from the finish of one to the start of the other and wound so that each was in phase (so that when energised, all Norths or Souths are facing the same way - monopole). Alternatively, it may be possible to retain permanent magnets and use additional electro-magnets to create a start-up condition.

[Grumage]

I doubt that the Torroidal "Stator" can drive the shaft because:
- The toroid is not braced sufficiently inside the plastic holder as not to "recoil" from any significant torque.
- small radius of the rotor (shaft) means small torque
- two wires supplying the toroidal windings are insufficient for 3-phase winding to create a rotating magnetic field.
- the geometry of the toroidal windings is wrong for creating a rotating magnetic field.

...and a weak argument that magnetizing the shaft or embedding permanent magnets in it is not visible and hard to do.
The delivery of strong current to the outer races of the ball-bearings does not require copper straps. The bolts holding the plummer/pillow blocks are quite sufficient for this purpose.

Dear Verpies,

With regard to your comments above. Points 1&2. IMO there IS little torque that is why the Disc assembly takes so long to reach running speed. But get there it will!
Teslas Columbus Egg demo was done with two phases.
Yes, to the eye the toroid does not appear to be wound correctly but with your reply to Hoppy and I quote"I strongly suspect that a different set if orthogonal windings is concealed under the ordinary toroidal winding."  Have you contradicted yourself?
And now you are suggesting that the shaft is a tubular one. You could "hide a bus in there"
Finally you did not make any comment about what effect a steady stream of Beta particles being radiated woud have upon a digital camera.

No malice given or intended........ Cheers Grum.

[verpies]

I can be confident that TK could 'size'  his power coil to ensure that this loss will still result in the performance we see in the video.

Yes, TK could sacrifice half of the magnetic field variations and the Bedini motor effect still would work.

Two coils supplied with 50Hz AC and connected in anti-parallel configuration, would create two time-alternating magnetic poles at the surface of the vertical aluminum plate of the pedestal, without the need for a trigger coil and pulses synchronized to the rotation of the disk.   Two of these time-alternating magnetic poles would produce a torque on the disk if the permanent magnet poles along its perimeter were also alternating NSNSNSNS.
The oversized coils inside the pedestals might vibrate the aluminum plates, creating the constant frequency saw-like noise. 

Maybe with this type of driving coil, no permanent magnets would be necessary at all and the brass disk could be propelled only by eddy currents, just like that disk in the old-style Electromechanical Induction Meter for monitoring electric energy usage or the Unipolar motor.
What do you think?

The air gap looks narrow to me, which would enhance torque to help overcome the effect of magnetic coupling losses due to the ali shielding between coil and magnets.

It looks like 10cm to me.  That's a lot for efficient magnetic coupling.