Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[v8karlo]

WO2013114285

ENERGETICALLY INDEPENDENT SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW NON-CONTACT METHOD TO COLLECT THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (BASED ON NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL WAVES) BY MEANS OF FORCE FIELD INTERACTION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

In this patent LIETUNOV VOLODYMYR states that closest to this invention is Tariel Kapanadze's WO2008103129 patent.


Quote from text of WO2013114285 LIETUNOV VOLODYMYR patent:

"The closest patent is the International Patent      Application No. WO2008103129, (Tariel Kapanadze's patent) published on August 28, 2008."
"This application describes an energy-independent system that generates energy surplus, part of which is used to sustain operation of system itself and the remaining part is sent to the power grid."

Unfortunately, Lietunov does not explains the principle of mysterious 3A module which is the key in this system, but he does give some hints about it's operation.

"The purpose of the energy collection module (3a) is      to collect a part of the said secondary electromagnetic radiation and to      convert it electric charge. The exclusive feature of this invention is that      electric charge is accumulated not on an antenna (via a contact), but in a      spatially separated circuit or a circuit system (also 3a) at some distance from      the source of electromagnetic radiation (which is the solenoid system (2a)),      where one end of the said circuit or a circuit system is suspended in air or      connected to an insulator (rather then connected to an electrically conducting      medium) and the other end of the said circuit system (3a) is connected to the      load network unit (3), more precisely, to the electric current module (3b)."


In he's patent Lietunov states that the only difference between he's and Tariel's device is that Tariel device has physical wire connection between antenna (selenoid) and output current module and it does require grounding. Lietunov device does not have antenna connection (wireless) and he eliminated need for ground connection.
Reading Lietunov patent it seems to me that Lietunov and Tariel devices are almost identical.

[magpwr]

Hi everyone,

For those whom are planning to modify transformer may i suggest to get in touch with this person from UK whom i spotted in youtube to get advise if it will work.
I believe he is a real transformer expert in youtube.


To date to my knowledge he is the only one in youtube whom designed a 50,000 Amp transformer in his home and made a light and cig lighter out of crowbar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXEPy6Za6cI


He also knows how to play with 300KV in his room.

[00]

So far I haven't seen anyone really try to "replicate" a Barbosa transformer using a MOT.
Replicate means reproduce exactly.
The patent says to wind the 1-2 turn secondary "on top of the primary".
All I see is people replacing the MOT secondary with a 1-2 turn new wire.
No one is placing the secondary "on top of the primary".
I know there isn't any room on a MOT to do this so why use a MOT?
Or remove the primary AND secondary, wind a new primary that is spread out so there is room to add a secondary on top of the new primary.
This would be "replicating" IMO.



Sorry for the interruption...  continue on with what you were doing... 
DonL

hello! dllabarre!

mot is refurbished so primary wont burn out when secondary 1 or 2 turns coil coil when shorted  in barbosa work without any problem. there must always be shortcut to success.

00

[Shokac]

So far I haven't seen anyone really try to "replicate" a Barbosa transformer using a MOT.
Replicate means reproduce exactly.
The patent says to wind the 1-2 turn secondary "on top of the primary".
All I see is people replacing the MOT secondary with a 1-2 turn new wire.
No one is placing the secondary "on top of the primary".
I know there isn't any room on a MOT to do this so why use a MOT?
Or remove the primary AND secondary, wind a new primary that is spread out so there is room to add a secondary on top of the new primary.
This would be "replicating" IMO.


Sorry for the interruption...  continue on with what you were doing... 
DonL

DonL

This is not solution.

I try all sorts of combinations, but nothing happens.

This loop coil is DRIVER for something.

Read patent:
The above objective and other objectives are achieved in the present invention by a device comprising at least three sets of at least one electromagnetic field generating device (without a core or with at least one core) powered by an electrical power source, having their cores or any extension of them, with their coils or sets of coils, wound on at least one common conductive member in a closed circuit which is polarised by a voltage source, and these sets of electromagnetic field generating devices are arranged with their poles in confrontation, to promote the interaction of electromagnetic fields, and, preferably, positioned between two hollow metallic hemispheres, in order to focus and enhance their electromagnetic fields - these interactions cause a new technical effect - the emergence of an electric current which keeps flowing in a closed loop, with or without voltage being applied to that closed loop, current which is capable of powering external loads - even if no load is attached to it.

[Hoppy]

Here is a revised version of my schematic showing the possible interconnections for TK's Tin Box device. A.King21 to note that a 'stick man' is not required for this device.