Time Traveler Sightings

[onthecuttingedge2005]

onthecuttingedge2005 said:The standard paradox I was thinking of was:  Killing your grandfather before he naturally died;  1) Either you wouldn't exist on the spot, or, 2) by the 'string universe(correct assumption?) theory', if you went back to where you were, everything would have been changed beyond recognition.

Hi Big M.

Nature always tends to throw a bone for the wolves to chew on, it keeps them happy. Nature always has a trick up its sleeve to prevent a paradox from an original time line from occurring in the same time line.

so nature shifts that time line to the next parallel time line and then that time line(for the time traveler) becomes a designer universe with a new time line to suit the paradox changes that must occur for the time traveler.

if you have a Super Quantum Computer that can calculate all possible Paradoxes out of the equation only then can you avoid paradoxes and stay in the original time line, so long as there is never a paradox that harms 'your' causality you would be okay.

since it is a form of relative quantum tunneling you would have no control over nature itself shifting you to another time line unless you obey the rules of nature.

You said above he was already dead---but I'll comment further below.
Interesting concept.  But, how exactly is this done?
See comment immediately above.

if you mean how is time travel done I might have to assume it is done with Quantum Tunneling of Relativity in accordance to the laws of Physics and Quantum reality.(not classical mechanics).

Time to leave this computer.

Later Gator.

Jerry

[the_big_m_in_ok]

onthecuttingedge2005 said:

...so nature shifts that time line to the next parallel time line and then that time line(for the time traveler) becomes a designer universe with a new time line to suit the paradox changes that must occur for the time traveler. ...

Hey Jerry,

Two different sources of information imply the same thin:  SciFi author Robert Heinlein(deceased), in several of his novels, and the String theory of Relativity in general, so to speak.
(I can't expound upon the theory without knowing the calculus that supports it(there is some---I've seen the notes on a TV documentary.)

...if you have a Super Quantum Computer than can calculate all possible Paradoxes out of the equation only then can you avoid paradoxes and stay in the original time line, so long as there is never a paradox that harms 'your' causality you would be okay. ...

Therein is a problem.  I've  'heard'  ''rumors'' that such a monster supercomputer exists somewhere, but that was given out by the likes of conspiracy theorists.
Do you know that such a computer exists and the information about its capabilities?

--Lee

[onthecuttingedge2005]

onthecuttingedge2005 said:

Therein is a problem.  I've  'heard'  ''rumors'' that such a monster supercomputer exists somewhere

Hi Big M

computer tech of today will always be replaced by those of tomorrow.
but since I tend to look far into technology as possible on these things I can say that one day computer technology will have a limit to the size of the Universe, if the Universe has a limit then computers will have a limit but if the Universe is infinite then computers will be infinite.

the reason being is that in those times computers if that is what you wish to call them will work on Quantum Singularity principles that interconnect through the entire Universe.

in those times would it be called a computer, I think that at some point the quantum singularity computer system would become aware of itself 'naturally' and surpass all living things besides itself.

a system that knows 'all' things even if the Universe is infinite and or finite.

but that was given out by the likes of conspiracy theorists.

the confusion can be maddening, I try to stay away from such things.

Do you know that such a computer exists and the information about its capabilities?

all I can say is that it will exist in future reference in accordance to our relativity and technological advances but it already exists throughout time and space as an entity via Quantum Singularity principles.

it's there, here, everywhere, those who do not look for such things will never be the wiser and will never see its presence.

kind of like God or God like or just Godly or maybe it is thee God, but in any account it is far superior than we will ever be.

any races in the universe that develop it just adds to its inter-connectivity of the Universe as a Singularity and a whole.

intelligence always tends to spawn intelligence, so long as there is life in the universe to develop the ultimate entity it will surely come to exist and since life spawned before us in other parts of the Universe it has already come into existence, we are just expanding it as we evolve with technological advancements.

we are like little cells in the Universe that are evolving a super entity unaware of what that entity is, we just do our jobs as cells and we are happy. just like the cells in your body but you just have to stand back and look at the whole entity.

I would not say that God is a machine because that does not fit the bill but rather God is the light of all Quantum Singleness throughout all time and space, the ultimate intelligence. so long as there is breath in the universe there will be a God. all species in the universe will come to balance out with it. some early and some late.

Jerry

[the_big_m_in_ok]

@onthecuttingedge2005,

Referring to your last post(Reply #17, this thread) in its entirety, You did present some concepts that I hadn't thought of before, but to describe them might be problematic.

I might try to take physics in college when I have the time or money, if ever.

For the Perfect Spacecraft, have you looked at the patents available at the Patent Office?

--Lee

[onthecuttingedge2005]

@onthecuttingedge2005,

Referring to your last post(Reply #17, this thread) in its entirety, You did present some concepts that I hadn't thought of before, but to describe them might be problematic.

I might try to take physics in college when I have the time or money, if ever.

For the Perfect Spacecraft, have you looked at the patents available at the Patent Office?

--Lee

Hi Big M.

I think I am going to hold off on the spacecraft for now, to much to learn for the moment.

Jerry