New invention of motion less generation of electric power

[forest]

Indeed. I speculate that electric current is composed of two components which are the same as for permanent magnet, flowing in opposite directions. Well,something like that afaik Ed Leedscalnin described in 1945.

[winsonali]

Gravity block:

in my case the situation is inverse may be coz i am using high frequency modulation for the purpose of
flow of current from active  mode to passive mode and then on particular time change the direction of flow by changing ground reference  in other wards swap the ground and live so we get the change of direction

the new formula i have figure out is current I is directly proportional to frequency f(swap) where as the base frequency remains same.

just think you have high frequency all the time but you change its ground reference with  50 hz
so base frequency used for transfer of energy from active mode to passive mode remains same and its direction is changing only
analogy: means in other words you have magnetic field changing its direction all the time and according to Faraday's law rate of change of flux is directly proportional to voltage same effect is taking place but the main component is changed from voltage to current.

i am driving the new equation to satisfy this situation and i think a swamping frequency of 6 HZ is enough to produce require voltages when there is no load but when you increase the load you need to increase the swapping frequency to keep the same level of voltage

i believe leading in this experiment is the clue of how to convert active energy from dead energy of magnet.

[winsonali]

i think i Got the key why other MEG's didn't work although they have flux and its varying in magnitude but if its not generating any advantage of that flux is due to the invisible factor that is taking place
it requires to setup new directions for electric power generation.
we are getting very close. 

[forest]

i think i Got the key why other MEG's didn't work although they have flux and its varying in magnitude but if its not generating any advantage of that flux is due to the invisible factor that is taking place
it requires to setup new directions for electric power generation.
we are getting very close.

is that flux which you modulate , oscillating like AC or unipolar like DC ? one polarity only or both ?

[winsonali]

forest:
very good question using signal processing technique i have generated AC frequency surmounted with on DC so it has  its base in positive direction so we have both components in the signal and surely it goes to ground and when you are changing grounds means you are changing the flux direction.
this experiment have given me new light its wonderful and this has answered various question.
especially
what is mutual inductance
why since years permanent magnets used in transformers could not play a positive role.
why other MEG setups failed.

The key is every body use fixed frequency or change duty cycle to get the power output
but the formula is if you have fixed flux in your system you have to change the frequency to get the adjustment of loads.

i am happy happy.