Understanding electricity in the TPU.

[Rosphere]

@all

I started this new thread to not meddle with other threads that are well ongoing and well advanced in a certain direction, that I thought some may consider it inappropriate to ask this in those threads.

So, the question really boils down to finding the secret to the workings of an SM TPU...

We are shown at the 7:30 time of Professor Konstantin Meyl's video: http://www.youtube.com/user/DBlundon#p/c/D8239A09B9BA3F6B/1/Dz5gNvSAcNo, a diagram of the near field activity of a D-pole antenna sending off vortexes of EMF filed lines.

Some have speculated that the TPU is receiving it's own transmissions, with gain.  If this mode type is correct then perhaps this near field vortex concept presented by Meyl is worthy of consideration.  We see in the third of four images, in the aforementioned diagram, EMF field lines in two counter rotating vortexes,... sound familiar?

Meyl explains in the rest of this video segment that the vortices unroll up to a wave at the transition between the near-filed and the far-filed, wavelength/(2*pi).  Due to its small size, I suppose that the TPU receiving 'antenna' must operate inside this near-field region.

I have no idea how to apply this concept to the TPU.  (It may be more expedient to purchase and/or replicate Professor Meyl's cookie-cutter Tesla kit with a few extra receivers: http://www.k-meyl.de/xt_shop/product_info.php?info=p6_Demo-Kit.html.  Has anyone here done so yet; what were your results?)

Happy New Year!   
Rosphere

[gyulasun]

Hi Folks,

I found this recent IEEE paper on Magnetic Resonant Coupling as a Potential Means for Wireless Power Transfer to Multiple Small Receivers

Download from here, might be useful for some of you:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~claytronics/papers/cannon-tranpe09.pdf

Happy New Year to you All!

Gyula

[wattsup]

Hello All

I guess I'll put this here.

Ever Since EMDevices made his pitch towards the HV lines and he showed his LED coils, I started doing my own trials in that direction but not as precise as EM's power transmission due to my lack of knowing how to tune these coils.

Anyways, I made so far 5 youtube videos regarding coils, leds and pulsing. The first one (Part 1) is located here;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODc943KCFLw

All you do after the first one is click on the More from: wattsup1004 link and the others will be listed.

I forgot to mention EMDevices in my videos but will do so in video 6 or 7 since there will be more coming.

[giantkiller]

@WU,
The vids are cool. The bloch wall has all the action. A zero point space with electrons orienting on both sides. When the pottential changes the poles flip and there happens to be wire right there. Electrostatic creation.
You mentioned placing copies around the toroid. SM said same thing about 'many wires'.

[wattsup]

@GK and @all

Let me post this while it is still fresh.

OK, I have been experimenting since the last video, trying to see how to prepare my Video 6 because I found some great new effects, but I have stumbled on something, not something, a notion, while pulsing coils with a battery using the Tesla Ozone Method via an IRF840, and it hit me.

We have been pulsing coils with a battery, creating all sort of effects, producing secondary outputs and hoping flyback will return to source, etc. But we have never asked ourselves one major question regarding one of the main components we use in our OU arsenal. THE BATTERY.

What is a battery and what can it do. When can it do it. When can't it do it. And then it hit me smack. When you create major havoc by shorting a battery and then letting it loose into a coiling scheme, during the short, voltage drops to zero, then we open the short and hope the flyback returns to the battery. So how many things can a battery do all at the same time. Can a battery provide a short and a flyback at the same time. Can it provide a pulse and take back a flyback at the same time. No it cannot. So whatever we do, it is always one after the other and that shift is where we lose precious time to augment the output. The output knows we are only really working half the time,  but we cannot do any different otherwise we cannot pulse. So as soon as you start pulsing, you are in effect sort of doomed to fail.

But what if the system included not one battery but two batteries. While one is pulsed, the other is relaxed. The beauty of DC is there is no phasing problems. All outputs can be paralleled and all will be additive.

You know that when you put a transformer primary on a battery terminal and you then short the battery temporarily, voltage in the secondary rises tremendously. So you do this with two batteries and two transformers in alternating fashion, but not as in alternating current.

OK, then with this notion is view, I think of the damn center toroid again and under this idea, a center toroid with only two coils, either bucking or not seems to make more sense. Each output enters the toroid and is used as a trigger to flip/flip from one circuit to the other. Bing bang bing bang. That would also explain the highest amperage readings over the two LTPU toroids.

Also, now the need for two frequencies, one slightly off the other also makes more sense.

I don't have the complete scheme worked out but I wanted to put it out there.

Most everything in nature works in pairs. If we equated the quest for OU to the making of the automobiles, have you every seen a car engine with only one piston (besides any special cases)? You have 4, 6, 8 and 12 (major hogs) pistons working in succession.

So imagine working 2, 3, 6, 9 batteries, each taking their slice of a cycle.

What do you think about this.

We don't need to look at patents for days on end. The idea is very simple and should not require major rocket science. But I am getting almost convinced that any builds with only one battery will run into major problems and even consider it failed from the start. Especially if there is a mosfet inline, that integrated diode kills the flyback and even if you do some fancy flyback switching to bypass the mosfet at the right time, you are still only working with one battery so off times will kill the output.

Maybe I am totally wrong on this, but, these days, things have been coming to me in steps and mulching all this logically, this notion for me seems to be the best direction to add to the coiling, coupling, transfer, pulse, flyback, build types, etc.

So I think for now I will start a new video soon on this but hopefully by then others will catch on and this can spread out for not only TPU works, but all sorts of OU works like the JT guys should start working on a new symmetrical dual battery drive design. You might say, It's time to grow up and bring this to the next logical level. You can't pulse and get flyback at the same time.

Looking back at Tesla Patents, Tesla never said, build only one. He probably showed us the one and figured we would know to use more in tandem.

Imagine two systems, each in their own resonance, meeting in the outer coil/rings. SM saying two fields moving in two directions. Sort of fits.