Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Understanding electricity in the TPU.

Started by wattsup, October 18, 2009, 12:28:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@all

Always looking for newer things to try out and here are two that could have some usefulness.

Maybe one realm to consider is running with two batteries but not connected together. One battery runs one side of a toroid while the other runs the other side of the toroid. Both coils get pulsed at the same time but the flyback (NOT BEMF) returns to the other battery. So you have each battery that pulses at the same time while the flyback goes to the other battery.

Usually a battery gets charged by another device (alternator, generator or other pulsed battery output, etc.) that has its own frequency or timing and not by itself. It is hard for a battery to do both when it is the same source of the pulse and the end destination for the flyback. There may be a condition there that has to do with the circuit overall resonance that inhibits the maximum recharge. So using two batteries may cause a greater recharging since each battery will see an outside source charging it. I want to know more about this. You can even have 12 batteries, one per primary coil and flyback always returns to the next battery. If that is feasible.

By using two circuits and batteries, the flyback can be sent to the opposing battery. So each one runs the toroid but is recharged by the other.

Now the only hold back to this idea is that both coils will still be on the same toroid core and may share a combined resonance and this may still hinder flyback recharge to opposing batteries. So the final solution to this idea may be to use two toroid cores with two primaries each and the flyback from one primary can go to one of the batteries in the other pair. This way, both are now isolated and the flyback will go from one resonance source to a totally isolated target battery.

Maybe on final note on batteries, flyback and/or reactive power recharge, etc. One question that is not very well defined is how do batteries really react to a recharge potential at varying recharge voltages. If you run a device on 12vdc that is producing 250vdc flyback potential, how does the 12vdc battery react to so much recharge voltage. Batteries are known to be able to efficiently recharge at up to 20% of its amperage rating but we know nothing about the voltage level influences. Will a 250vdc flyback be 100% absorbed by the 12vdc battery or is there inherent loss due to the mis-match of voltage between them. What if the flyback went back into a separate battery bank that had 20 x 12vdc batteries in series. This way the flyback would enter into a battery bank that has the same or slightly less absorptive capacity as the flyback level. Would that make a difference in battery recharge.

Then you would ask OK, now you have 21 batteries in series being well recharged so what do you do with so much voltage. Well, you can switch them into parallel back to 12vdc and send it back to main battery, or instead of switching to parallel, you can pulse that 250vdc through a 20:1 ratio toroidal transformer to then send it back at higher amperage back to the main battery.

What we are missing in our devices is this series to parallel relationship. We are asking one coil (or two identical wound coils) to do both voltage and amperage production. This is very difficult to do and will invariably produce heat dissipation hence energy loss. If the series to parallel relationship are properly matched to the device design, this heat loss should be diminished hence more energy is available to be reconverted to the initial source. All these effects play either for or against the device in question. I had made a small diagram of a toroid coil that may explain this better.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8185.msg239217#msg239217

The other question or effect is how to use a diode in a non-classical way. That is to say in using a diode but not in the forward sense. If you have a load with a positive lead with diode pointing to the source, the load will not see the source so it cannot load. But that diode also has a reverse acting parameter. I noticed it during my pulsing coil videos. I think that is what gave the 800 volts reactive. So if the source is resonant to the diode reverse flow point, then you would be getting energy shots going into the load. The load could be a secondary circuit as well as a bulb. The reverse of the diode could be used as a higher amperage pulsing method.

I will be testing these two ideas during the coming weeks as well as a few other new ideas for coil windings. Keep thinking out of the box.

wattsup

The Observer

Quote from: EMdevices on August 28, 2010, 12:20:53 PM
sounds good GK,  I like the two transformer approach.  I have a hard time believing the 3 freq SM explanations anyway. 

I've been holding something back for a few months, because I need to  analyze it more completely,
       but in brief I've concluded that circuit analysis seems to indicate power amplification
               from a Don Smith and Kapandaze type of resonant step down circuit.


Maybe I'm just fooling myself.
I want to build stuff first before I open my mouth,
so I can avoid the foot in the mouth repercussions.  :)

EM

5 months later... and no update from EM on this or anything else. (cept condolences for Otto)
A previous regular poster... hmm

Hope things are well EM. ;o)
I'm sure if you are working with Resonance and FerroMagnetic Cores... you are on to something special.

Best Regards,
                    The Observer

stivep

Quote from: Loner on November 22, 2009, 11:01:30 PM



Just for an interesting  aspect I have been unable to prove, as I don't have a scale with no metal parts.  (Could be seeing a field effect?)


Good luck.  This is the stuff that keeps me coming back for more.

Art.

You do not need scale with no metal parts
string+ upper roler+ from the other side TENSIOMETER  (spring with scale)

If you do not have one  than put on the  regular scale  "something heavy" ,than attach to it  string go up around the roller( grove one)  go down and attach  measured "opposite vector" to the end of the string.
Than whatever weight is in the string...that much lighter would be that "something heavy"   

field effect could be obtain  using gaussmeter as well   in my  lab - RFL 912 gaussmeter

Wesley

PS:I'm reading all  of this............
Great people Thank You all of you, You are what was needed for all of this years..

So what is not so optimistic?
Well............ some of you  mix up apple with bananas..........
But ,since we "up side  down" traditional science.....I'm not going to criticize it as of yet.
Maybe I'm one who is  in error...
I wish I'm......

wattsup

@stivep

Thanks again for your long and tedious work of translation. And, luckily I happened. upon your other video;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1f5sgAdc9w&feature=autoplay&list=ULcs_plkrTfj8&index=1&playnext=3

It was a visual symphony to my eyes. Nice lab. Really nice.

wattsup


stivep

Quote from: wattsup on January 11, 2011, 09:42:23 PM
@stivep

Thanks again for your long and tedious work of translation. And, luckily I happened. upon your other video;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1f5sgAdc9w&feature=autoplay&list=ULcs_plkrTfj8&index=1&playnext=3

It was a visual symphony to my eyes. Nice lab. Really nice.

wattsup

I wish I could make this lab to be available for you to allow you to experiment.
I went to fast to high with everything and I have got stacked. Instead of me to provide experiments I'm trying to fight with mechanical part.Very heavy mils and 2000 pounds CNC - Novakon NM-200
lathe and so on... Carry on all of this to the basement,and preparation ( I have wasted close 2 months)
take it  a part and together again to fit into the hatch.
But we all will be able to help each other and I DO THANK YOU   for this help.

Wesley