Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!

Started by giantkiller, October 29, 2009, 02:31:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.


giantkiller

Middle layer sections of the GK4.

This is set up, step up, set up, step up.
Not electrostatic yet.
That is when the trinaries are wrapped around the secondaries.

Have model in Visio for easy doco. The coil is just as easy to config. The GK3 is same section configuration but continuous stranded wrap and heavier gauge with copper core. Transformers, just like in the movies.

Have top and bottom layers to include also.

forest

nice coils

Use aluminium shield around them and attach kind of Avramenko plug beetween shield and real ground using led diodes.If only one diode will light then it may be safe , if both then it may generate harmful RF radiation.Still aluminium shield is a good advice however I haven't figured yet how to make it clear like glass  :D
of course it's all theoretical based on Kozyrew experiments.

giantkiller

That's Kozyrev.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19489945/Kozyrev-Mirrors-and-Electromagnetic-Null-Zones

Absolutely most fascinating!
This also fits in with the design of the comp wave detection device. A receiving amplifier enclosed in an iron tube. Naudin shows the specs to build one.

Current efforts:
I am going to test the dual pulse protocol as a spark gap replacement. I am in the process to build a variable gap distance SG.
Don Smith used the NST to charge and discharge a gap just to smack his resonating coils. I want to use a small gap to test. With this I can go back and test the stungun input to it.

The reason I mention this is I don't see how a circuit without a spark gap can produce the required hard hit or kick against the coil. The last 3 years have produced many builds or coils and circuits to attempt this. The spark gap or Bedini magnet polar shear is the only way I see as the simplest attempt that produces the most impact. To try this any other way or to find the holy grail of circuit operation is an effort far too deep into the physics of particular devices or special arrangements of circuit configurations. I will let others go down this solid state path. I have seen the size of the internal spark gap of the stun gun and am still in awe about its potential / voltage production.
It really is quite simple. The gun is 2 stages. The first stage is a 5khz blocking oscillator to a minature audio transformer that outputs to a diode chain, spark gap, capacitor. No different than in alot of Tesla's stages and patents. The last stage is the configuration that matches up with the type of output with the environmental interface whether it be 2 small terminals or a ground connection and an vertical aerial. Still a stun gun. The little black box in the SM17 could easily hold the stun gun circuit as well as the open TPUs holding separate components to perform this not so Herculean output. The TPU configurations are just smacked resonant ringers.
So instead of competing against the substrate's physical properties, stressed or obscure operation, winding configurations I am going back to spark gaps.

--gk. 'nuff sed.

h2ocommuter

@GK
For an accurate SG with micro adjustments .001" per revolution I use a 19" wedge design "<" side is stationary that sets up a consistant tortion for tightenss of this end , The ">" side is 7" and the adjusting screw is 1/8 " course all-thread
The gap itself is set about 4" from the narrow end.
If you are up to building two, for the different effects that a grounded spark does instead of an air gap you may consider using a ground rod between the two spark probes, this also needs an adjustable end as well if you intend on using more than one spark gap at a time.

I have compiled videos that will show how the timing of the sparks can be manipulated using this device. and some pic as well.
Don stated using a gap of .0025 Surely this is directly related to the charge within that part of the circuit only. secondly we might also say the gap separates the circuit in that manner. Depending of course where the spark is conducted " to ground or into the circuit. or both.

Anyway it is a very good design. but not as easy to do as I have put forth here.

Good luck